OK.  As promised.  My findings!

All component values were correct.
All soldering was done to the correct pads.
All the joints looked good....until....
I took a really close look at T2's leads.

On the bottom they looked great but on the top (really hard to see)
they were not bonding to the pad. Either I didn't strip off enough enamel or shoved the lead in too far or both.

Anyway, you folks were correct. I applied a little heat, a little more solder, waited a few seconds and voila'...
You can guess the outcome.  Thanks for assist!

72,
Glen, NK1N


----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Johnstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Yet another KX-1 Question


Ron,

Thanks for the info. You are correct about the testing. I wouldn't have even done my test except it 'sounded' low.

I'll be troubleshooting tonight. I may have miswound T2 or goofed on a component sub or better yet, soldered 'em to the wrong pads. I'll post my findings.

 73,
 Glen, NK1N

 PS. I know you meant "origanal KX1".

Ron D'Eau Claire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Glen, NK1N wrote:
I agree on the receiver sensitivity. I aligned my 2 band KX-1 with a -103
dBm signal. When I used a -73 dBm signal (standard S9), I got 4-5 bars on
the S-meter for 40 and 20. Perfect!

After building and installing the KXB3080 and doing all the RX alignments,
I find the -73 dBm signal barely lights 2 bars on 20. Hmmm.

I expect the KX1 20m circuitry was compromised to pull it down to 80m.

-------------------------------------

Just the opposite Glen.

The receiver front end circuitry was redesigned to operate very efficiently
across the 80-20 meter range. The original KXB3080 uses a simple
capacitively-coupled input circuit. The KXB3080 mod replaces this with a
transfomer-coupled input.

I wouldn't suggest how effective looking at the "S-Meter" is for evaluating receiver performance. I haven't tried it. Running actual SN+N/N sensitivity
tests, I found the end result was actually slightly *better* receiver
performance on all four bands.

Ron AC7AC

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to