Not really Dave, until you're sending at sufficient speed to tax the sequencing of the radio.  QSK is "inherently" a receive function -- mute the receiver while generating RF, unmute when it's not.  TXDelay waits <mumble> ms before starting RF to let amplifier switching settle, at which point you're either going to generate key clicks or not depending on the timing and waveshape of the RF envelope.

If you hot switch anything, you're going to create lots of noise, much of which will be indistinguishable from simple key clicks. But, stop the hot switching and you do NOT automatically stop the key clicks, particularly if the radio allows you to adjust the rise/fall times of the RF envelope [a very stupid idea] and you've set it very short.

In today's radios, other things may happen such as shifting frequencies if you're split, and that just adds to the complexity.  But basically, the fact that QSK means you can hear between code elements does not impact your CW waveform.  Your CW bandwidth is a result of the timing and waveform of the beginning and end of your RF envelope for each element which Joseph Fourier figured out way before any of us were born or radio and CW had been invented.

73,
Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
Sparks NV DM09dn
Washoe County

On 6/6/2020 6:00 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
QSK has everything to do with it.  If you hot switch the amp you create
sharp waveforms every element even if the K3 keying is soft.  The
discussion on the contesting forum included comments that the default
setting for TXDELAY on the K3 (apparently 008) isn't long enough and that
it should be set to 009.  Not sure which amps were being considered.

73,
Dave   AB7E



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to