It was an unwritten rule, but the use of ZBM2 on any circuit was a big no-no, 
or at least during my time with Naval Security Group.   Anytime we had trubs 
with an outlying station, we would gather up the translog and any other copy of 
the Comms and up the chain of command it would go...I think I only saw a ZBM2 
fly by once while I was out on Guam.  It went across one of IO circuits during 
GW I.  Heard thru the grapevine weeks later that Op was relieved...We were 
required to maintain a copy  of the ACP-131 on the watch floor.  It made for 
some interesting reading on slow mid-watches.  I recall we came up with all 
sorts of Q/Z codes that we Zapped back and forth.  I think we used INT QBF Mate 
K quite often in place of ZBM2   😉   Always a good laugh to get a Chief of the 
Watch to ask what the hell was QBF... There were all kinds of Z codes in use 
too that we would throw out just to mess with the ops on the other end...Great 
times during  a slow midwatch!   Forget off hand what the Z code was for
"Your totally distorted"!  but after a weeks worth of watchstanding,  I would 
treat the younger Marines on my watch to total distortion down at the E club on 
the start of our off time and we'd all get to the "point of no return" (forgot 
that Z code too!)...


73, Todd KH2TJ


________________________________


Good point Andy!  QLF seems to refer to sending ability.  ZBM2 refers to
overall operating ability ... I think ... ACP's 126 and 131 leave a lot
to the reader's imagination.


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to