Right on, John! Also N7WS, who urges study of N6LF's authoritative site. Rudy is a major contributor to ARRL Handbook and Antenna Book. And to AB7E who urges modeling. You can't model radial/counterpoise systems without a far more capable version of NEC, but you CAN model the difference between horizontal and vertical antennas and heights of both.

Lyn's expectations are modest. Many of us want to work 5,000 - 8,000 mile paths, which is what it takes to work 175 countries from W6 in 14 years -- it's FAR easier to work EU east of the MS river, and EU has FAR more countries with active hams than AS and OC. I know -- I lived in IL. One of my goals is QRP WAS. In about ten years, I still need VT and SC. And I've got three 160M verticals, all using my tower as a passive reflector to give me a few dB in three directions!

Here are slides for a talk I've done at Pacificon, Visalia, and to several local clubs. It's mostly about antennas, mostly about radial/counterpoise systems. None of it is my original work, but rather summarizes the best work by others like N6LF.

http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf

WAS from east of the MS is also far easier than from W6 -- there are only seven west coast states, all with superstations that are easy to work -- CA, OR, WA, AK, HI, AZ, NV. There are also big stations in MT, ID, NM, and UT.

73, Jim K9YC


On 8/25/2020 6:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
KD5ODS is not over thinking anything.  He is on the right track, an inverted
L is a much better top band antenna than a low all band horizontal wire.
Kevin just needs to model his inverted L, he might be a little surprised to
see which way the pattern skews.

John KK9A


Lyn W0LEN

Good gracious.  Why does everyone overthink 160m?

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to