I am afraid K4HD is going to be even more expensive and when compared performance/features/price ratio with FTDX101 that has the same architecture Elecraft K4HD does not look to me like a good investment. I will keep my K3 and KX3 though and will possibly consider FTDX10 which sounds like a good value for money. If only Yaesu did not have those tiny difficult to find and deal with connectors. I have also got used to at least 3 audio output ports on K3 with own AF amplifier each. UI on Elecraft radios is sure much better thought out but the price tag overweight.

73, Igor UA9CDC

08.06.2021 11:53, George Thornton пишет:
I agree that the price for the K4 has to be compared with the fully loaded K3 
plus P3.   In that respect it is not overpriced.

I don't think we should make too much of the Sherwood Engineering test data at 
this point.    I would suspect it would be hard for the human ear to tell the 
difference among the top eight or ten models on the list.  I also think that 
when the K4 HD unit is out you might see higher results.  I suspect direct 
sampling technology is not as capable as superhet when it comes to separating 
out closely spaced signals which is what Sherwood Engineering uses to rank 
radios.



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of turnbull
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 11:27 PM
To: Doug Person <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Giving Up

GM Doug,    A fully loaded K3 P3 was always dear.   It rivalled the 7850 price 
but did not reach the cost while arguably being the better radio.   The fully 
loaded K4 is less expensive to my reckoning in todays money than the loaded K3 
with P3 and physically smaller.    I suspect it may not be so much superior to 
the K3 in RF terms except that it is in the important area of ergonomics.   The 
wait has been excessive for sure.Your reasonng is understandable.   Hope the 
next radio is great.   Meanwhile keep enjoying ham radio.I will keep waiting.73 
Doug EI2CNSent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Doug Person <[email protected]> Date: 
08/06/2021  03:34  (GMT+00:00) To: [email protected] Subject: [Elecraft] 
Giving Up Sadly, I've decided to give up waiting for the K4. I'm probably far down 
the list anyway. Their are numerous reason for this decision. First, there is the 
cost. With a tuner the price is $4600 making it one of the most expensive 
transceivers on the market. I fully realize that the K4 is feature rich and extremely 
well designed. I would never take anything away from Elecraft's engineering ability. 
The K3 set a new standard of performance that made the other manufacturers 
substantially up their game - which they did. But is the K4 going to do the same 
thing the K3 did? To me, it doesn't look like it. Innovative in some, perhaps many 
ways - yes. A new trend setter? I'm not so sure. When the K3 came out it was very 
competitively priced. I'm not sure I would describe the K4 with the same words. It is 
unquestionably an expensive radio. At this point the price/performance just isn't 
there for me. I sold my very complete K3 station several years ago in anticipation of 
the K4. But now the waiting has left me thinking about how much I'm willing to invest 
and whether or not another brand whose transceivers are as much as $1500 less and 
whose performance seems quite impressive will meet my needs. After literally several 
years of contemplation I conclude that, for me, the K4 is not worth the price. $3600 
(with the tuner since every other significant radio includes one) would seem 
competitive and I would jump on it at this price. But as it is? Can't see doing it. I 
apologize if feelings are hurt or I've made anyone angry. I'm leaving the list since 
I'm no longer waiting patiently for what we once called Vaporware.Good luck to 
everyone on their current and future K4s.Doug -- 
K0DXV______________________________________________________________Elecraft mailing 
listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:[email protected] list hosted 
by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: 
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to [email protected] 
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to