> Who uses this K2 ( KDSP2 ) noise reduction ? > Does it really work that unbelievably well as the sample on the K2 > page suggests ?
Peter Don't forget the DSP unit costs 1/3 the price of a basic K2. In answer to your question, mine is as effective as the samples on the Elecraft web site. Most of the time I prefer to just use it as an expensive bandwidth filter and generally I do not use the noise reduction. The KDSP2 is more configurable than some other audio DSP units such as those in the TS570 and FT857D. The K2 is a significantly better receiver than either of those two rigs and has a very low internal noise level. My FT857D has a higher than average "hiss" level which needs DSP to minimise the noise! For portable operation from the KBT2 (internal lead-acid battery), the current consumption of the DSP may be an issue as it increases overall current by around 60 mA with the DSP working (10 mA in bypass), the simple KAF2 filter by comparison has a current consumption of 10 mA. The K2 can be used without an extra audio filter, so if current is important to you it might be worth running one in "minimum" configuration. I don't find the real time clock to be of any use. The most useful addition to the K2 is probably the KAT2, if you are looking to buy a second hand K2 that ATU is worth considering. 73 Dave, G4AON K2 #1892 - more or less modified to the latest standard, except for crystal filter changes. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
