This list was updated in 2018. 

http://www.telepostinc.com/soundcards.html 
<http://www.telepostinc.com/soundcards.html>

wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)

> On Oct 31, 2021, at 11:54 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> What I haven’t quite figured out is how important is this really is
>> to weak signal digital decoding.
> 
> Low noise in a sound card is important to weak signal decoding in two
> ways:
> 
> 1) you want the inherent noise floor in the sound card to be 10 to 15
>   dB *LESS* than the minimum - receiver noise + "antenna" - noise.  On
>   VHF with a very quiet receiver the receiver noise can be quite low.
> 
> 2) high noise level in a sound card directly subtracts from the dynamic
>   range (ADC clipping - noise floor).  With a high noise floor, strong
>   signals either overflow the ADC or the receiver AGC must reduce gain
>   with moves the weak signals below the (higher) noise floor.
> 
>> After testing, I settled on a Sound BlasterX G5 model SB1700 which 
> > tested at about -120dB noise level.
> 
> -128 dB relative to what?  A quality 16 bit sound card has a theoretical
> dynamic range of 97dB - a quality 16 bit card (low noise) will produce
> about 90 dB dynamic range in practice.  A 24 bit sound card has 144 dB
> theoretical dynamic range but a practical 24 bit sound card will produce
> maybe 115 dB dynamic range but to take advantage of that dynamic range
> the sound card (any audio preamps and the ADC) need to operate with a
> supply voltage greater than the typical 3.3 or 5 V USB supply.  A 24 bit
> sound card with a 5 V (USB) supply will be lucky to achieve 100 dB
> dynamic range.
> 
> 73,
> 
>   ... Joe, W4TV
> 
> 
> On 2021-10-31 10:41 AM, SteveL wrote:
>> Dave,
>> This interest caught my eye awhile back:
>> http://members.chello.at/oe1mww/sound-card-check/ 
>> <http://members.chello.at/oe1mww/sound-card-check/>
>> I’ve tested several of the inexpensive (<$10) nameless USB sound card 
>> dongles using his method and saw a wide variety of noise floors - however 
>> significantly higher than a name brand USB card.  After testing, I settled 
>> on a Sound BlasterX G5 model SB1700 which tested at about -120dB noise 
>> level.  How does this compare?  My nameless sound dongles noise level tested 
>> -70 to -90dB - a big difference.
>> What I haven’t quite figured out is how important is this really is to weak 
>> signal digital decoding.
>> Steve
>> aa8af
>>> On Oct 30, 2021, at 10:49 PM, David Christ <radio...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes this has been bead to death previously. Jim Brown made a number of 
>>> suggestions in a paper from 2014.  However the market has changed.  Those 
>>> models are all discontinued and those manufacturers' follow ons are much 
>>> more expensive and have features that are not needed for sound card modes.  
>>> Any offerings of these older models seem to be coming from overseas.  The 
>>> $100 and under market seems to be dominated by mystery brand dongles which 
>>> are a gamble.
>>> 
>>> So can any one recommend a tried and true sound card interface for use 
>>> between an K3 (without a sound card) and a MacBook Pro (which has no mike 
>>> or line in jack)?  I would like to hear from people who have actually the 
>>> unit, not just speculation.
>>> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to