I bought a new IC-7000, a month out of warranty main board failed. Cost me near 
$1k including shipping. I share your pain….but I won’s scapegoat Elecraft whom 
I have had great repair dealings with over the years.
Gene
KH6XJ 

> On Jan 14, 2022, at 10:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Elecraft -- tarnished, bent and broken crown (Tim C)
>   2. Re: New wattmeter plans? ([email protected])
>   3. Re: New wattmeter plans? (jerry)
>   4. Re: New wattmeter plans? (Tom Ewing)
>   5. Re: New wattmeter plans? (Jim Brown)
>   6. New wattmeter plans? (Bob McGraw)
>   7. Re: New wattmeter plans? (Josh Fiden)
>   8. Re: New wattmeter plans? (jerry)
>   9. Re: New wattmeter plans? (Charles K0MV)
>  10. For Sale:  Cumbria Designs Mini-DSP Filter Kit (Doug Hensley)
>  11. Re: New wattmeter plans? (Jim Brown)
>  12. K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark / WU6R) (Mark Wheeler)
>  13. Re: K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark / WU6R)
>      (Bayard Coolidge, N1HO)
>  14. SOLD - DSP Filter Kit is SOLD (Doug Hensley)
>  15. Re: K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark / WU6R) (Mark Wheeler)
>  16. [OT] Loss in window line [OPINION] [LONG] (Al Lorona)
>  17. Re: [OT] Loss in window line [OPINION] [LONG] ([email protected])
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:29:33 +0000
> From: Tim C <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft -- tarnished, bent and broken crown
> Message-ID:
>       
> <ch2pr13mb4523abf95e043ef513c185bce1...@ch2pr13mb4523.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
>       
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Elecraft - Tarnished, bent and broken crown.  For many years I believed 
> Elecraft was king.  Now I'm not so sure.  I purchased a KPA500 and KAT500.  I 
> assumed with all the trouble, protective, and shutdown circuits they would 
> last a long time and probably never need service.
> 
> The Elecraft service tech erroneously advise me to ship it to Calif when it 
> would not transmit which cost $71.  Turn out to be an interface cable and not 
> the amp.  The amp didn't need to be shipped.  I had to pay $67 for another 
> cable which should have been warranted.
> 
> Some months past and the amp wouldn't transmit again.  An Elecraft services 
> tech advised me to ship it back to calif since it was under warrantee.  This 
> time the shipper charged $140 because the nursing home where I live was 
> required to ship it commercial and insured.  The tech could have suggest the 
> obviously burned resister be replaced.
> 
> I have been a ham for over 50 years.  I had a SB-220 for over 40 years and 
> never had to disassemble it for repairs.  I've owned Yaesu's, Icom's and 
> Alinco's, all new, and never had ship any of them for repairs or even repair 
> them after years of use.
> 
> I have always heard only praise for Elecraft product.  There are less costly 
> tuners and amps on the market but I believed Elecraft would be the most 
> durable and reliable.
> 
> Before I purchase another Elecraft product I will do even more research and 
> comparisons.
> 
> 73, Tim WB8HRO
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:26:26 -0500
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <004401d808d4$fc9f31d0$f5dd9570$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Look at the Telepost meters:
> http://www.telepostinc.com/
> 
> John KK9A
> 
> 
> Steve Masticola WX2S wrote:
> 
> I bought a W2 today, because my Meterbuilder MB-1 wattmeter's directional
> coupler died and the product seems to be an orphan. But I wonder if Elecraft
> has any plans to bring out an updated wattmeter. The W2's design is ten
> years old, and the LED bargraph displays are getting a bit long in the
> tooth.
> Any rumors, or more than rumors?
> 
> 73, -Steve WX2S
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:56:44 -0800
> From: jerry <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> On 2022-01-13 15:26, [email protected] wrote:
>> Look at the Telepost meters:
>> http://www.telepostinc.com/
>> 
> *** Wow.
> 
>   OK, I ordered one.
> 
>                 - Jerry KF6VB
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> John KK9A
>> 
>> 
>> Steve Masticola WX2S wrote:
>> 
>> I bought a W2 today, because my Meterbuilder MB-1 wattmeter's 
>> directional
>> coupler died and the product seems to be an orphan. But I wonder if 
>> Elecraft
>> has any plans to bring out an updated wattmeter. The W2's design is ten
>> years old, and the LED bargraph displays are getting a bit long in the
>> tooth.
>> Any rumors, or more than rumors?
>> 
>> 73, -Steve WX2S
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:57:16 -0600
> From: Tom Ewing <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> 
> I have two W2 meters and like them. 
> 
> I?m also a Powermaster II fan. 
> 
>> On Jan 13, 2022, at 5:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> ?Look at the Telepost meters:
>> http://www.telepostinc.com/
>> 
>> John KK9A
>> 
>> 
>> Steve Masticola WX2S wrote:
>> 
>> I bought a W2 today, because my Meterbuilder MB-1 wattmeter's directional
>> coupler died and the product seems to be an orphan. But I wonder if Elecraft
>> has any plans to bring out an updated wattmeter. The W2's design is ten
>> years old, and the LED bargraph displays are getting a bit long in the
>> tooth.
>> Any rumors, or more than rumors?
>> 
>> 73, -Steve WX2S
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected] 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:24:46 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 1/13/2022 3:26 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Look at the Telepost meters:
>> http://www.telepostinc.com/
> 
> Yes. I've been using LP100A with two probes in my SO2R station for 8-10 
> years. Recently bought a second one to go inline with my long 6M Yagi, 
> which is on the second antenna port of the KPA1500.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:18:20 -0600
> From: Bob McGraw <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> Why not just buy a nice clean Bird 43P and a new element or two. Not 
> hamfest elements.?? That works for me and gives total confidence on what 
> I see as power output.?? Of course if one desires all equipment to 
> match, then so be it.
> 
> 73
> 
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> On 1/13/2022 3:23 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Message: 22
>> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:04:24 +0000 (UTC)
>> From: Steve Masticola<[email protected]>
>> To:"[email protected]"  <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
>> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> 
>> I bought a W2 today, because my Meterbuilder MB-1 wattmeter's directional 
>> coupler died and the product seems to be an orphan. But I wonder if Elecraft 
>> has any plans to bring out an updated wattmeter. The W2's design is ten 
>> years old, and the LED bargraph displays are getting a bit long in the tooth.
>> Any rumors, or more than rumors?
>> 
>> 73, -Steve WX2S
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:50:09 -0800
> From: Josh Fiden <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Bird is a classic, I keep one on out of my 6m amp. But they?re not cheap. 
> Comparing cost and features with an LP100A not a hard choice IMHO. 
> 
> 73,
> Josh W6XU
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jan 13, 2022, at 5:19 PM, Bob McGraw <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> ?Why not just buy a nice clean Bird 43P and a new element or two. Not 
>> hamfest elements.   That works for me and gives total confidence on what I 
>> see as power output.   Of course if one desires all equipment to match, then 
>> so be it.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:03:29 -0800
> From: jerry <[email protected]>
> To: Josh Fiden <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 2022-01-13 17:50, Josh Fiden wrote:
>> Bird is a classic, I keep one on out of my 6m amp. But they?re not
>> cheap. Comparing cost and features with an LP100A not a hard choice
>> IMHO.
> 
> *** Room for both.  I have a Bird 4410a.  Multiple ranges -
> can measure from QRP up to 10kW.  An Ebay deal.  Don't know
> how well it's calibrated, and it doesn't do peak power.
> 
>   So I just ordered an LP100A.  With the work I've been doing with 
> linear amplifiers, I am very interested in accurate power readings.
> 
>                  - Jerry KF6VB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 73,
>> Josh W6XU
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Jan 13, 2022, at 5:19 PM, Bob McGraw <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ?Why not just buy a nice clean Bird 43P and a new element or two. Not 
>>> hamfest elements.   That works for me and gives total confidence on 
>>> what I see as power output.   Of course if one desires all equipment 
>>> to match, then so be it.
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:07:21 -0700
> From: Charles K0MV <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> I came across this very interesting presentation that you may find 
> informative:
> 
> https://www.hamradioworkbench.com/uploads/1/1/9/9/119903037/k6jey_wattmeter_talk.pdf
> 
> 73,
> 
> Chuck K0MV
> 
> 
> On 1/13/22 7:03 PM, jerry wrote:
>> On 2022-01-13 17:50, Josh Fiden wrote:
>>> Bird is a classic, I keep one on out of my 6m amp. But they?re not
>>> cheap. Comparing cost and features with an LP100A not a hard choice
>>> IMHO.
>> 
>> *** Room for both.? I have a Bird 4410a.? Multiple ranges -
>> can measure from QRP up to 10kW.? An Ebay deal.? Don't know
>> how well it's calibrated, and it doesn't do peak power.
>> 
>> ? So I just ordered an LP100A.? With the work I've been doing with 
>> linear amplifiers, I am very interested in accurate power readings.
>> 
>> ???????????????? - Jerry KF6VB
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> Josh W6XU
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 13, 2022, at 5:19 PM, Bob McGraw <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ?Why not just buy a nice clean Bird 43P and a new element or two. 
>>>> Not hamfest elements.?? That works for me and gives total confidence 
>>>> on what I see as power output.?? Of course if one desires all 
>>>> equipment to match, then so be it.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected] 
> -- 
> Charles K0MV
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 02:24:39 +0000
> From: Doug Hensley <[email protected]>
> To: Elecraft List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] For Sale:  Cumbria Designs Mini-DSP Filter Kit
> Message-ID:
>       
> <sa0pr19mb4409b1227c97a74f4938e95f91...@sa0pr19mb4409.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
>       
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I have a DSP Audio filter kit that I don't have time to use and thought
> I would offer it here for anyone with a K1 or K2 that might want to try
> adding their own DSP Audio Filter.
> 
> Cumbria Designs was a British concern famous for its "X-Lock" VFO
> stabilizer used on many K1's and older gear with a VFO that was a free
> running oscillator.  Works miracles.
> 
> This Mini DSP Audio Filter kit was one of their last kits (they closed
> doors and moved on to other things) and offered personal tailoring
> of the audio product.  I can send a data sheet to anyone interested.
> The kit I have has never been gone through, never touched except
> to store for a better day.  Looking at it I would think anyone who
> successfully built their own K1 or K2 could also handle this.  Having
> said that, I also think this kit is not for beginners.  You should have
> some good experiences under your belt.
> 
> I'm asking $125 plus $5 shipping.
> 
> QSL if interested.  I'm shutting down now for the night so will not be
> able to reply to anyone until tomorrow AM.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Doug W5JV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Visit https://www.qrz.com/db/W5JV for some great vacuum tube finds.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:01:33 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New wattmeter plans?
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 1/13/2022 5:50 PM, Josh Fiden wrote:
>> Bird is a classic, I keep one on out of my 6m amp. But they?re not cheap. 
>> Comparing cost and features with an LP100A not a hard choice IMHO.
> 
> Yes, it's a classic. But the LP100A comes with individually calibrated 
> probes, has peak reading modes, reads complex impedance, and is capable 
> of greater precision. Early in the life of the K3, I'd heard on good 
> authority that an LP100A was in use at Elecraft for final test.
> 
> I have two Birds and a large stash of elements, but they only get used 
> for bench and troubleshooting. I just made a gift of one to a friend who 
> got burned out in the major wildfire that almost got us too.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:28:58 -0000
> From: Mark Wheeler <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Mark Wheeler <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark / WU6R)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8;    format=flowed
> 
> Tried to do a K4 update yesterday from R26 to R28 and I get a network 
> failure. Ethernet cable is attached and blinking but K4 does not see it. 
> Replaced cable with same results.K4 update screen says "Production Release 
> 0"; not sure what I'm doing wrong.Mark WU6ROn Jan 13, 2022, at 4:26 PM, 
> [email protected] wrote:Send Elecraft mailing list submissions 
> [email protected] subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, 
> visithttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftor, via email, send a 
> message with subject or body 'help' [email protected] can 
> reach the person managing the list [email protected] 
> replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specificthan "Re: 
> Contents of Elecraft digest..."Today's Topics: 1. New K4 beta software 
> available (Release 28) (Wayne Burdick) 2. Re: K3s USB sound card not 
> receiving MMTTY audio (Mike Dodd) 3.  K3s USB sound card not receiving MMTTY 
> audio ([email protected]) 4.  post
> ing to list ([email protected]) 5.  Internet / cell phones ([email protected]) 6. Re: 
> Internet / cell phones (Thorsten Fricke) 7. OT Donating Surplus Gear (Paul 
> Huff) 8. Re: OT Donating Surplus Gear (David Hourdequin) 9. KPA1500 reflected 
> power faults (Steve Masticola) 10. Re: KPA1500 reflected power faults (Jim 
> Brown) 11. Re: OT Donating Surplus Gear (Barry Baines) 12. Re: KPA1500 
> reflected power faults ([email protected]) 13. on a K3 with dual receivers,      
> can I listen on 2 different bands? (David F. Reed) 14. Re: on a K3 with dual 
> receivers, can I listen on 2 different bands? (Rich) 15. Re: on a K3 with 
> dual receivers, can I listen on 2 different bands? (David F. Reed) 16. Re: 
> KPA1500 reflected power faults (Jim McCook) 17. K3 fails 5W and 50W TX 
> calibration (Edward Seeliger) 18. RemoteRig - Control-RRC (Steve Orland | 
> AA6AA) 19. Re: K3 fails 5W and 50W TX calibration (Jim McCook) 20. Re: 
> KPA1500 reflected power faults (Steve Masticola) 21. K2 Menu and Tune Buttons 
> (Aaron K5ATG) 22. Ne
> w wattmeter plans? (Steve Masticola) 23. 40 meter SSB net, Jan 9, 7.280 
> (Steve Hall) 24. KX2 for sale (Richard 
> Gilley)----------------------------------------------------------------------Message:
>  1Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:43:31 -0800From: Wayne Burdick 
> <[email protected]>To: Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]>Subject: 
> [Elecraft] New K4 beta software available (Release 28)Message-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=us-asciiRelease 28 is now available as beta, with several new 
> features (including the DVR) and major improvements. Upgrading is strongly 
> recommended in order to remain current.Release notes for R28 are listed 
> below. These as well as earlier release notes can also be found on our 
> website, as well as directly at the radio itself in the UPDATE 
> utility.********************************************NOTE: IF YOU USE NON-FLAT 
> TRANSMIT EQ, you will need to re-adjust the settings one timeafter loading 
> this softw
> are release. Seerelease notes for 
> details.********************************************73,WayneN6KR========================
>  RELEASE 28 ============================= FUNCTIONAL CHANGES =====AUDIO 
> OUTPUT IMPROVED BY 10 DB: In previous releases, maximum audio output may have 
> been as much as 10 dB lower than the target value with some combinations of 
> the AGC slope and threshold menu settings. Now, maximum AF output is 
> pre-compensated for AGC behavior. This results in a minimum speaker output of 
> about 1.5 W into 4 ohms and 1.0 W into 8 ohms. (The new AF output 
> specification will be at 1 W rather than 2 W.)S-METER NOW 6 dB PER S-UNIT: 
> S-meter calibration now matches the more common industry standard. 
> (Previously it was 5 dB per S-unit.) With this change, each tic mark of the 
> S-meter graphic represents 3 dB.DVR (DIGITAL VOICE RECORDER): The DVR can now 
> be used for transmit voice message record/play. There are 8 messages (2 banks 
> of 4). Tap REC, then follow on-screen prompts. Message
> s can be played without on-air transmit by using transmit test mode (TEST 
> switch). Maximum message length is 90 seconds. NEW BACKUP/RESTORE FUNCTION: 
> Tap Fn, then hold BACKUP. This brings up the backup/restore screen. You can 
> select whether to backup or restore five categories of data, including 
> General Configuration, Frequency Memories, PF Key and K-Pod Macros, 
> CW/PSK/FSK messages, DVR messages, and Diagnostic Logs.SEPARATE TX MONITOR 
> LINE-OUT LEVEL CONTROL: Use TX Monitor Level, Line Out menu entry. Applies to 
> both sidetone and voice monitoring, as well as to both analog and digital 
> line out.ICON CHANGE FOR RX DYNAMIC RANGE OPTIMIZATION: The original icon, a 
> visual hybrid of 'D' and 'R', was judged too cryptic by users. The new icon 
> is "DR+", allowing the operator to for search for it in the operating 
> manual.BUILT-IN OPERATING MANUAL UPDATED TO REV. C12. Covers all recent 
> changes.===== BUG FIXES =====TX EQ SLIDERS NOW +/- 16 dB: The EQ sliders had 
> been incorrectly set to +
> /- 4 dB. If you use non-flat EQ, you may need to do a one-time readjustment 
> of the sliders.ELIMINATED DUAL IP ADDRESSES for the radio. This occurred very 
> rarely.MENU IP ADDRESS FIELD EXPANDED: The parameter field now accommodates 
> 12-digit IP addresses.ELIMINATED LOSS OF AUDIO on power-up (rare).VFO STEP 
> RATE PRESERVED across power-downs.TX METERS STAY ON IF SPLIT TURNED ON/OFF 
> WHILE TRANSMITTING.SBC DATE CORRECTED ON 3V BATTERY SWAP.===== FOR SOFTWARE 
> DEVELOPERS =====ADDED VO$ COMMAND (VFO OFFSET). This can be used to directly 
> offset either VFO by a specified amount.ADDED XVTR SUPPORT FOR BN+; and BN-; 
> commands.FI$; COMMAND AI RESPONSE NOW SENT ON BAND 
> CHANGE.------------------------------Message: 2Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 
> 18:30:26 -0500From: Mike Dodd <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: Re: [Elecraft] K3s USB sound card not 
> receiving MMTTY audioMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8; format=flowedOn
>  1/10/2022 2:50 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:You can eliminate this problem in the 
> future by just leaving it on LINE IN all the time.? Of course, that makes 
> phone hard but it works for me. ?I believe the MIC=LINE IN is automatically 
> set when I select DATA MD = AFSK-A, so it's a puzzle to me why this wasn't 
> the case on Saturday when I set up for RU. At least I know to check it next 
> time I use RTTY.73, Mike N4CF------------------------------Message: 3Date: 
> Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:21:12 -0500From: <[email protected]>To: 
> <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft]  K3s USB sound card not 
> receiving MMTTY audioMessage-ID: 
> <002401d80681$23f73120$6be59360$@com>Content-Type: text/plain;     
> charset="us-ascii"Great that you have this resolved but unfortunate that it 
> occurred after theARRL RTTY Roundup. I use FSK for RTTY transmission which so 
> far has beenvery simple and stable.GLJohn KK9A (W4AAA in 2022 RU)Mike Dodd 
> N4CF wrote:That's what I remember, and after I set MIC SEL = Line In for RTTY 
> (AFSK A)
>  on 80m, it was set that way on all bands. I'm sure I had it set up this way 
> in the past, and I have no idea why it wasn't set correctly yesterday at the 
> start of RTTY RU.Anyway, now I know what to check if it happens again.73, 
> Mike N4CF------------------------------Message: 4Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 
> 19:21:19 -0500From: <[email protected]>To: <[email protected]>Subject: 
> [Elecraft]  posting to listMessage-ID: 
> <002501d80681$27ec1200$77c43600$@com>Content-Type: text/plain;   
> charset="us-ascii"You're posting a message with no content.Jack Donovan 
> wrote:Mon Jan 10 12:25:20 EST 2022------------------------------Message: 
> 5Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:21:25 -0500From: <[email protected]>To: 
> <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft]  Internet / cell 
> phonesMessage-ID: <002601d80681$2b725290$8256f7b0$@com>Content-Type: 
> text/plain; charset="us-ascii"Brilliant, Jim!Jim Clymer ws6x wrote:Anyone 
> else see the irony here?"Sent from my iPhone"!!!Jim - WS6XOn Mon, Jan 10, 
> 2022, 10:18 AM Vincent Di
> ak <unclebend13 at gmail.com>wrote:We all should spend less time on our cell 
> phone's and the internet. Thenwe would not be wondering why our hobby is 
> fading away . When there werenocell phones and internet to communicate we had 
> cw - ham radio and landline. The internet has taken these away. Good or bad? 
> We now carry theworld in our pocket . Next will be chip programmed to 
> communicate withoutcell phones and the internet 666 just like the Bible 
> says.Sent from my iPhone------------------------------Message: 6Date: Tue, 11 
> Jan 2022 14:14:51 +0100From: Thorsten Fricke <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: Re: [Elecraft] Internet / cell 
> phonesMessage-ID: <[email protected]>Content-Type: 
> text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowedAgree, this is really brilliant 
> *lol*Am 11.01.22 um 01:21 schrieb [email protected]:Brilliant, Jim!Jim Clymer 
> ws6x wrote:Anyone else see the irony here?"Sent from my iPhone"!!!Jim - 
> WS6XOn Mon, Jan 10, 2022, 10:18 AM Vince
> nt Diak <unclebend13 at gmail.com>wrote:We all should spend less time on our 
> cell phone's and the internet. Thenwe would not be wondering why our hobby is 
> fading away . When there werenocell phones and internet to communicate we had 
> cw - ham radio and landline. The internet has taken these away. Good or bad? 
> We now carry theworld in our pocket . Next will be chip programmed to 
> communicate withoutcell phones and the internet 666 just like the Bible 
> says.Sent from my 
> iPhone______________________________________________________________Elecraft 
> mailing listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:[email protected] 
> list hosted by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: 
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to 
> [email protected]: 7Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 
> 08:32:10 -0500From: Paul Huff <[email protected]>To: Elecraft Email List 
> <[email protected]
> .net>Subject: [Elecraft] OT Donating Surplus GearMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain;     
>    charset=utf-8With my wife?s encouragement, I recently purchased my ?holy 
> grail? radio - an Elecraft KX3.  Along with this purchase came the decision 
> to reduce my radio ?footprint? and get rid of a lot of my old gear that is no 
> longer getting much use.  Some of this equipment has some non-trivial 
> monetary value, but I don?t need the money, I don?t want to go through the 
> hassle of trying to sell it, and I don?t want to deal with shipping issues.  
> I want to just give it away locally, preferably to a club that could use it 
> (or the proceeds from selling it) to help younger or disadvantaged hams get 
> on the air.I?m a 100% QRP/CW operator and most of this stuff relates to that. 
>  The gear includes an Elecraft K1, Rockmite 30, SST40, MFJ Versa Tuner II, 
> Astron PS, various accessories and numerous books.  I have a 3-page pdf 
> document that gives a comple
> te list.  Almost everything is in perfect working order and there are both 
> hard and digital copies for most of the owners manuals.I will organize 
> everything, box it up, and can deliver it to just about anywhere in the SE 
> Michigan area.  I want to donate all of it as a group and not piece it out a 
> little bit at a time.  If you are associated with a local club that could use 
> this donation to promote ham radio, or know somebody who is,  please contact 
> me off the list.Thanks and 73,Paul Huff - N8XMSLivonia, 
> MI------------------------------Message: 8Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:34:53 
> -0500From: David Hourdequin <[email protected]>To: Paul Huff 
> <[email protected]>Cc: Elecraft Email List 
> <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT Donating Surplus 
> GearMessage-ID: <[email protected]>Content-Type: 
> text/plain;        charset=utf-8More of us need to be doing more of ?this?!  
> Thnaks for the inspiration Paul!73, David, NS4VDavid R. Hourdequin, PEHeavy 
> Timber & 
> Glulam EngrgP.O. Box 1399Hayesville, NC. [email protected] Jan 
> 11, 2022, at 8:32 AM, Paul Huff <[email protected]> wrote:With my wife?s 
> encouragement, I recently purchased my ?holy grail? radio - an Elecraft KX3.  
> Along with this purchase came the decision to reduce my radio ?footprint? and 
> get rid of a lot of my old gear that is no longer getting much use.  Some of 
> this equipment has some non-trivial monetary value, but I don?t need the 
> money, I don?t want to go through the hassle of trying to sell it, and I 
> don?t want to deal with shipping issues.  I want to just give it away 
> locally, preferably to a club that could use it (or the proceeds from selling 
> it) to help younger or disadvantaged hams get on the air.I?m a 100% QRP/CW 
> operator and most of this stuff relates to that.  The gear includes an 
> Elecraft K1, Rockmite 30, SST40, MFJ Versa Tuner II, Astron PS, various 
> accessories and numerous books.  I have a 3-page pdf document that gives a 
> complete list. 
>  Almost everything is in perfect working order and there are both hard and 
> digital copies for most of the owners manuals.I will organize everything, box 
> it up, and can deliver it to just about anywhere in the SE Michigan area.  I 
> want to donate all of it as a group and not piece it out a little bit at a 
> time.  If you are associated with a local club that could use this donation 
> to promote ham radio, or know somebody who is,  please contact me off the 
> list.Thanks and 73,Paul Huff - N8XMSLivonia, 
> MI______________________________________________________________Elecraft 
> mailing listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:[email protected] 
> list hosted by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: 
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to 
> [email protected]: 9Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 
> 16:33:44 +0000 (UTC)From: Steve Masticola <[email protected]>T
> o: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft] 
> KPA1500 reflected power faultsMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8Hi, all,My KPA1500 is throwing a lot of reflected power faults 
> at power levels above 500 watts. The symptom is that the output power (as 
> indicated by the power LEDs) zooms up and then the amp faults. An external 
> MB-1 power meter indicates 2000 watts or more peak output when this happens.I 
> know the usual culprits (poor ground, RF in the shack, surge suppressors), 
> but I wonder if other owners are still having these problems, despite 
> attempts to fix.73, -Steve WX2S------------------------------Message: 10Date: 
> Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:01:06 -0800From: Jim Brown 
> <[email protected]>To: [email protected]: Re: 
> [Elecraft] KPA1500 reflected power 
> faultsMessage-ID:<[email protected]>Content-Type:
>  text/plain; charset=UTF-8; for
> mat=flowedOn 1/11/2022 8:33 AM, Steve Masticola via Elecraft wrote:I know the 
> usual culprits (poor ground, RF in the shack, surge suppressors), but I 
> wonder if other owners are still having these problems, despite attempts to 
> fix.I have grounding and bonding done right, no issues at all like this. It 
> IS common for a K3 to have a small power spike after changing its power 
> output, but this is typically less than 1 dB.73, Jim 
> K9YC------------------------------Message: 11Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:40:47 
> -0600From: Barry Baines <[email protected]>To: Paul Huff 
> <[email protected]>Cc: Elecraft Email List 
> <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT Donating Surplus 
> GearMessage-ID: <[email protected]>Content-Type: 
> text/plain;    charset=utf-8Paul:On Jan 11, 2022, at 7:32 AM, Paul Huff 
> <[email protected]> wrote:With my wife?s encouragement, I recently 
> purchased my ?holy grail? radio - an Elecraft KX3.  Along with this purchase 
> came the decision to r
> educe my radio ?footprint? and get rid of a lot of my old gear that is no 
> longer getting much use.  Some of this equipment has some non-trivial 
> monetary value, but I don?t need the money, I don?t want to go through the 
> hassle of trying to sell it, and I don?t want to deal with shipping issues.  
> I want to just give it away locally, preferably to a club that could use it 
> (or the proceeds from selling it) to help younger or disadvantaged hams get 
> on the air.I?m a 100% QRP/CW operator and most of this stuff relates to that. 
>  The gear includes an Elecraft K1, Rockmite 30, SST40, MFJ Versa Tuner II, 
> Astron PS, various accessories and numerous books.  I have a 3-page pdf 
> document that gives a complete list.  Almost everything is in perfect working 
> order and there are both hard and digital copies for most of the owners 
> manuals.I will organize everything, box it up, and can deliver it to just 
> about anywhere in the SE Michigan area.  I want to donate all of it as a 
> group and not piece
>  it out a little bit at a time.  If you are associated with a local club that 
> could use this donation to promote ham radio, or know somebody who is,  
> please contact me off the list.I donated my ?surplus? gear back in 2019 to a 
> high school amateur radio group in Gainesville, FL.   My station is in SE 
> Georgia and I spent four years in Gainesville back in the late 70s, so I knew 
> the club?s advisor through the Gainesville Amateur Radio Society,  We 
> reconnected in 2018 due to luck and circumstance and I subsequently learned 
> about the school?s amateur radio club.  When I made the donation I drove to 
> the high school to deliver the ?goods? and later the advisor drove to my ham 
> station to pickup a second load.     I documented the donation and provided 
> the list to the High School.  They subsequently confirmed the receipt of 
> items donated, including an Icom IC-781, a Yaesu FT-736R,  and an Alpha 9500. 
> Like you, I was primarily interested in passing good equipment to the ?next 
> generati
> on? as well as seeing the equipment in active service as it was sitting on 
> shelves.  An active high school club fits that requirement nicely.  So one 
> thing to consider is looking to see if such clubs exist in your area.  Local 
> hams may be serving as club advisors.  Perhaps a local school experienced an 
> ARISS contact and has a relationship with an amateur club as a result of that 
> experience.  Talk to local educators to see if they have such clubs at 
> particular schools. I still hear from the club advisor concerning the high 
> school amateur radio club and the activities of the students.  I believe my 
> donation has had an impact on students which makes me feel that I?ve a made a 
> difference for those that are using this equipment as well as enhanced the 
> high school?s club activity.FWIW,Barry Baines, WD4ASW/5Keller, TXThanks and 
> 73,Paul Huff - N8XMSLivonia, MI------------------------------Message: 12Date: 
> Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:58:21 -0500From: <[email protected]>To: <[email protected].
> net>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 reflected power faultsMessage-ID: 
> <000001d80757$e0a77650$a1f662f0$@com>Content-Type: text/plain;  
> charset="us-ascii"Is it possible that something is heating or arcing in the 
> device you areusing to match your 43 ft vertical? John KK9ASteve Masticola 
> WX2SHi, all,My KPA1500 is throwing a lot of reflected power faults at power 
> levels above500 watts. The symptom is that the output power (as indicated by 
> the powerLEDs) zooms up and then the amp faults. An external MB-1 power 
> meterindicates 2000 watts or more peak output when this happens.I know the 
> usual culprits (poor ground, RF in the shack, surge suppressors),but I wonder 
> if other owners are still having these problems, despiteattempts to fix.73, 
> -Steve WX2S------------------------------Message: 13Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 
> 03:39:46 +0000From: "David F. Reed" <[email protected]>To: Elecraft List 
> <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft] on a K3 with dual receivers,   
> can I listen on 2different
>  bands?Message-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8; format=flowedOn a K3 with dual receivers, can I listen on 2 
> different bands?If so, how (or where does it tell me how in the manual)?-- 
> Thanks & 73 de Dave, W5SV------------------------------Message: 14Date: Tue, 
> 11 Jan 2022 23:49:43 -0500From: Rich <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: Re: [Elecraft] on a K3 with dual receivers, 
> can I listen on 2different bands?Message-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8; format=flowedGoto:CONFIG - VFO IND - set it to YESYou can then 
> listen to different bands on each VFOYou may find more in the manual 
> regarding VFO IND.?? Mine is not handy so I am not sureRichOn 1/11/2022 22:39 
> PM, David F. Reed wrote:On a K3 with dual receivers, can I listen on 2 
> different bands?If so, how (or where does it tell me how in the 
> manual)?------------------------------Message:
>  15Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:42:33 -0600From: "David F. Reed" 
> <[email protected]>To: Rich <[email protected]>Cc: 
> [email protected]: Re: [Elecraft] on a K3 with dual receivers, 
> can I listen on 2different bands?Message-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain;   
> charset=us-asciiThanks Rich!73 de W5SV - David F. ReedOn Jan 11, 2022, at 
> 22:49, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:Goto:CONFIG - VFO IND - set it to 
> YESYou can then listen to different bands on each VFOYou may find more in the 
> manual regarding VFO IND.   Mine is not handy so I am not sureRichOn 
> 1/11/2022 22:39 PM, David F. Reed wrote:On a K3 with dual receivers, can I 
> listen on 2 different bands?If so, how (or where does it tell me how in the 
> manual)?______________________________________________________________Elecraft
>  mailing listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:[email protected]
>  list hosted by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: 
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to 
> [email protected]: 16Date: Wed, 12 Jan 
> 2022 14:43:46 +0000From: Jim McCook <[email protected]>To: Elecraft Reflector 
> <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 reflected power 
> faultsMessage-ID: <[email protected]>Content-Type: 
> text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowedSteve:? I went through this exact 
> problem until K6XX alerted me to the likely cause of corrupt? TXGAIN 
> calibration.? This was discussed recently and reaffirmed by Elecraft on this 
> reflector.? Most likely the problem originates from transmitting with either 
> 5 or 50 watts with the K3, which should ALWAYS be avoided.? I suggest you 
> redo the 5 and 50 watt TX Gain calibration individually on each band as K6XX 
> suggested. This should have been emphasized in the K3/K3S manuals.? 73, Jim 
> W6YA------------------------------Messa
> ge: 17Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:41:02 +0000From: Edward Seeliger 
> <[email protected]>To: Elecraft reflector 
> <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft] K3 fails 5W and 50W TX 
> calibrationMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=utf-8Today I tried to perform a K3 TX calibration using the K3 
> Utility?and it fails calibration at the 160M (first frequency in the series) 
> attempt on both 5W and 50W settings. It freezes and remains with the TX light 
> illuminated. The power button will not turn the radio off. I must unplug the 
> rear power connector to turn it off. After reinserting the power connector 
> the power button and all other controls appear to work as they should until I 
> again attempt a TX power calibration. The radio is in Normal not Test mode.I 
> have sent a message to elecraft support but thought others here might have 
> had a similar problem and might have a solution.?The K3 is a s/n 6000+ K3 
> with all suggested hardw
> are upgrades and current firmware.Why did I attempt the TX calibration - I 
> read the recent suggestion about not setting the PWR to 5W - I use this K3 to 
> drive a high gain (low power input) linear and probably have at times set the 
> drive to around 5W.Thanks for any help or suggestions.Edd - 
> KD5M------------------------------Message: 18Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:11:06 
> -0800From: "Steve Orland | AA6AA" <[email protected]>To: 
> <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft] RemoteRig - 
> Control-RRCMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain;  
> charset="us-ascii"Does anyone in the Los Angeles County/Ventura County area 
> have a Control-RRCthat I can borrow for a day?  My Control-RRC appears to be 
> malfunctioning.Tnx es 73,Steve------------------------------Message: 19Date: 
> Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:03:14 +0000From: Jim McCook <[email protected]>To: Elecraft 
> Reflector <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 fails 5W and 
> 50W TX calibrationMessage-ID: <4313
> [email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8; format=flowedEdd:? Using the Utility for this process can have 
> problems.? I did it manually on each band.? K6XX also suggested to to it this 
> way.Connect a dummy load to the K3 output.Set the PWR control on the K3 to 
> exactly 5wSet CONFIG: TUN PWR to exactly 5wHold TUNE for 2-3 seconds.? Tap it 
> againRepeat the process at 50wReset TUN PWR to other than 5 or 50.? I use 
> 25Reset PWR in the K3 to the usual 100w settingRepeat everything above on 
> each band.Jim W6YA------------------------------Message: 20Date: Thu, 13 Jan 
> 2022 00:56:55 +0000 (UTC)From: Steve Masticola 
> <[email protected]>To: "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 reflected power 
> faultsMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8Problem found. It was an intermittent fault on a bidirectional 
> coupler for a wattmeter. It finally fa
> iled hard. When I took the coupler out of circuit, the amp behaved itself.73, 
> -Steve WX2S On Tuesday, January 11, 2022, 11:33:44 AM EST, Steve Masticola 
> <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, all,My KPA1500 is throwing a lot of 
> reflected power faults at power levels above 500 watts. The symptom is that 
> the output power (as indicated by the power LEDs) zooms up and then the amp 
> faults. An external MB-1 power meter indicates 2000 watts or more peak output 
> when this happens.I know the usual culprits (poor ground, RF in the shack, 
> surge suppressors), but I wonder if other owners are still having these 
> problems, despite attempts to fix.73, -Steve WX2S 
> ------------------------------Message: 21Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:24:34 
> -0600From: Aaron K5ATG <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: [Elecraft] K2 Menu and Tune 
> ButtonsMessage-ID:<cadens2-ebyaea_jynu4eefbvh-olsdcxz2dydgozbnwx1rq...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type:
>  text/plain; charset="UTF-8"This evening I tried 
> to get into the menu on my K2 and pushing orholding the MENU/EDIT button does 
> nothing at all. When I press the ANT1/2 Button it switches from Antenna 1 to 
> Antenna 2. However, when Ihold the button to tune with the internal ATU the 
> display LCD justshows Atu and the bar graph goes completely blank. This is 
> the firsttime that it has done this and it has been working just fine 
> untilnow. I'm not sure how to remedy this.-- '72Aaron 
> Scott------------------------------Message: 22Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:04:24 
> +0000 (UTC)From: Steve Masticola <[email protected]>To: 
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Subject: [Elecraft] New 
> wattmeter plans?Message-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=UTF-8I bought a W2 today, because my Meterbuilder MB-1 wattmeter's 
> directional coupler died and the product seems to be an orphan. But I wonder 
> if Elecraft has any plans to bring out an updated wattmeter. The W2's design 
> is ten 
> years old, and the LED bargraph displays are getting a bit long in the 
> tooth.Any rumors, or more than rumors?73, -Steve 
> WX2S------------------------------Message: 23Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:31:20 
> -0500From: Steve Hall <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: [Elecraft] 40 meter SSB net, Jan 9, 
> 7.280Message-ID:<CALdUqNO5rfMtVY8w8Xu=9xa4ebjkhvu_u2_ribya2ocg+d4...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type:
>  text/plain; charset="UTF-8"THANKS TO ALL CHECKING IN AND TO RELAY 
> STATIONS.WM6P STEVE GA K4D #436W3SA JOHN NC TS890W9EJB ED IN K4D #498N8SBE 
> DAVE MI K3SKO4FCO BOB TN FTDX10NK9A STAN MIK5PD PETE TX K3W4TMW TOM GA 
> K4K4FKB CYRUS AL FT450DKD9TII RON IN FT900WB9JNZ ERIC IL FTDX101DNC0JW JIM CO 
> KX3W4DML DOUG TN K3VA2FH GILBERT QUEBEC 
> K3------------------------------Message: 24Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:23:00 
> -0500From: Richard Gilley <[email protected]>To: 
> [email protected]: [Elecraft] KX2 for saleMessage-ID: 
> <[email protected]>Con
> tent-Type: text/plain;        charset=utf-8HI, Selling my KX2 #02335 
> purchased Dec 2017, Lightly used and includes:KXPD2 -paddleKXBT2 -LI 
> BatteryKXBC2 -ChargerKXAT2 -Ant TunerAX1/W40 meter coilTripod AdapterCase 
> (not CS40 or CS60)32? Counterpoise wireManualAsking $1100. Inc. shipping and 
> Insurance within the 48.Photos available at [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>Thank youR 
> GilleyAD1G------------------------------_______________________________________________Elecraft
>  mailing listPost to: 
> [email protected]http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftYou 
> must be a subscriber to post.Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.comEnd of 
> Elecraft Digest, Vol 213, Issue 5****************************************
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Bayard Coolidge, N1HO" <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,    Mark
>       Wheeler <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark /
>       WU6R)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> "R28" is still in beta testing, AFAICT, so you may have to forage around on 
> the firmware download menu screento make sure your K4 will download beta-test 
> firmware.
> Either that, or wait a little while for the formal release.
> 73,
> Brandy, N1HO
> 
> 
>    On Friday, January 14, 2022, 09:30:36 AM EST, Mark Wheeler via Elecraft 
> <[email protected]> wrote:  
> 
> Tried to do a K4 update yesterday from R26 to R28 and I get a network 
> failure. Ethernet cable is attached and blinking but K4 does not see it. 
> Replaced cable with same results.K4 update screen says "Production Release 
> 0"; not sure what I'm doing wrong.Mark WU6ROn Jan 13, 2022, at 4:26 PM,  
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:36:01 +0000
> From: Doug Hensley <[email protected]>
> To: Elecraft List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] SOLD - DSP Filter Kit is SOLD
> Message-ID:
>       
> <sa0pr19mb4409b26a5e2e8af56e71fc3091...@sa0pr19mb4409.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
>       
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Thanks to all who responded.
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Doug Hensley
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 8:24 PM
> To: Elecraft List <[email protected]>
> Subject: For Sale: Cumbria Designs Mini-DSP Filter Kit
> 
> I have a DSP Audio filter kit that I don't have time to use and thought
> I would offer it here for anyone with a K1 or K2 that might want to try
> adding their own DSP Audio Filter.
> 
> Cumbria Designs was a British concern famous for its "X-Lock" VFO
> stabilizer used on many K1's and older gear with a VFO that was a free
> running oscillator.  Works miracles.
> 
> This Mini DSP Audio Filter kit was one of their last kits (they closed
> doors and moved on to other things) and offered personal tailoring
> of the audio product.  I can send a data sheet to anyone interested.
> The kit I have has never been gone through, never touched except
> to store for a better day.  Looking at it I would think anyone who
> successfully built their own K1 or K2 could also handle this.  Having
> said that, I also think this kit is not for beginners.  You should have
> some good experiences under your belt.
> 
> I'm asking $125 plus $5 shipping.
> 
> QSL if interested.  I'm shutting down now for the night so will not be
> able to reply to anyone until tomorrow AM.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Doug W5JV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Visit https://www.qrz.com/db/W5JV for some great vacuum tube finds.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:50:49 -0000
> From: Mark Wheeler <[email protected]>
> To: "Bayard Coolidge, N1HO" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K4 Update "Network Failure" error (Mark /
>       WU6R)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8;    format=flowed
> 
> Is R26 still the most current for most users? Or is there an R27?73,Mark 
> WU6ROn Jan 14, 2022, at 9:35 AM, "Bayard Coolidge, N1HO" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:"R28" is still in beta testing, AFAICT, so you may have to forage 
> around on the firmware download menu screento make sure your K4 will download 
> beta-test firmware.Either that, or wait a little while for the formal 
> release.73,Brandy, N1HOOn Friday, January 14, 2022, 09:30:36 AM EST, Mark 
> Wheeler via Elecraft <[email protected]> wrote:Tried to do a K4 update 
> yesterday from R26 to R28 and I get a network failure. Ethernet cable is 
> attached and blinking but K4 does not see it. Replaced cable with same 
> results.K4 update screen says "Production Release 0"; not sure what I'm doing 
> wrong.Mark WU6ROn Jan 13, 2022, at 4:26 PM,
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Al Lorona <[email protected]>
> To: Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] [OT] Loss in window line [OPINION] [LONG]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Whenever somebody mentions "window line" here, one of the first objections 
> raised is that "when it gets wet, it has very high loss".?
> 
> The landmark paper cited is by Wes Stewart, N7WS, which can be found 
> here:?https://www.sadxa.org/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf?.
> 
> I'm not trying to discredit that paper in any way, but I'd like to point out 
> two things to keep in mind the next time you hear someone completely and 
> summarily dismiss window line on the grounds that it has "high loss when 
> wet", and citing that paper:
> 
> 1. You should note that Wes took measurements at 50 MHz. Window line is 
> rarely used at that frequency, and anyway the loss has to be extrapolated 
> back down to the HF region. For instance, if wet window line has a loss of 
> 5.2 dB at 50 MHz, the loss at 10 MHz is only 2.3 dB and at 3.5 MHz is 1.4 dB. 
> (See the paper for the equation to extrapolate to another frequency.) 1.4 dB 
> sounds a heck of a lot better than 5.2, and is on par with 100 feet of the 
> best coax you can buy. (We are talking only about matched line loss here, and 
> ignoring additional loss due to SWR.) So that's the first thing.
> 
> 2. Wes's method involved the now legendary use of a "wetting agent" (I assume 
> soap of some kind) added to the water he sprayed onto his 12-foot sample of 
> transmission line to simulate rainy conditions on weathered line. To be fair, 
> Wes himself cautioned that this probably created a worst-case scenario but 
> judging from other references on the web this wetting agent has been blamed 
> for excessively inflating the loss to the point of questioning the relevance 
> of the experiment. DJ0IP and G3TXQ have both claimed that 
> (see?http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/wet_ll/?).??In G3TXQ's case, he was able to 
> replicate Wes's results by using "a few drops of washing-up liquid" but he 
> states, "It is not clear whether the high losses associated with using the 
> wetting agent were due to the more complete wetting of the line or to some 
> electrical properties of the agent. Nor is it clear how well this test 
> represents conditions that will be experienced in the 'real world'."
> 
> What's happening to the line when it gets wet, and why should it's 
> characteristics change at all? To answer this, understand that in balanced 
> line, the energy is carried in the field between the conductors. Window line 
> has mostly polyethylene (PE) between the wires which has a dielectric 
> constant of 2.3, as opposed to air's which is 1.0. Spraying water-- which has 
> a dielectric constant of 80-- onto PE insulation changes the material 
> properties between the conductors and, thus, the capacitance. As capacitance 
> changes, so does? everything else: velocity factor, impedance, and loss. One 
> thing saving us from a catastrophic change in properties is that water tends 
> to bead up and remain as droplets, and droplets don't like to stay connected 
> with other droplets. So if you looked at a path perpendicularly across the 
> surface of the line, you'd see individual, sparse drops rather than a 
> continuous film of water.
> 
> I couldn't find the dielectric constant of soapy water anywhere on the web -- 
> but let's assume that the number is close to that of pure water: 80. If you 
> could somehow give the field a *continuous* path of water from one side to 
> the other on the window line, you'd have significantly altered the dielectric 
> constant of the PE; you'd essentially have added a new "path" in "parallel" 
> with the PE with a dielectric constant some 35 times higher. Although it 
> would be a very thin layer, it nonetheless could have a significant effect, 
> as N7WS and G3TXQ have shown.
> 
> We also have an important data point from Bob, K4TAX, showing that the loss 
> of Bob's window line is pretty much unaffected by rain, although the 
> electrical length does change. I'll address why this might be later on, but 
> the point is that this is credible, measured data. Why are these data so 
> different?
> 
> I did discover that soapy water's pH is above 10 -- possibly as high as 12-- 
> indicating that there are abundant salts present, probably sodium and/or 
> potassium. These dissolved salts strongly ionize the water, greatly 
> increasing its conductivity (and perhaps changing its other electromagnetic 
> characteristics). On the other hand, rain water is essentially pure, much 
> closer to distilled water, with relatively few contaminants capable of being 
> ionized. 
> (See?https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/cwt/guidance/3130en.pdf).?
> 
> Having said all of this, when you study the G3TXQ paper I mentioned earlier, 
> there's a glaring data point: Steve measured nearly constant, high loss, 
> using soapy water, *from 7 through 30 MHz*. This confirms that an effect of 
> the soap is swamping out everything else. In other words, there's something 
> *in the soap itself* that is skewing the measurements beyond its intended 
> purpose. He just wanted the soap to make the water cling better, but it ended 
> up perturbing the very thing he was trying to measure (loss) way too much. 
> It's a little bit like taking a lot of vitamin D for health, which causes you 
> to become constipated!
> 
> My conclusion is that using soap to make the water cling to the window line 
> was a brilliant idea but may have introduced much more error into the 
> measurement. I believe the trend is correct -- that clinging water will 
> increase loss-- but the absolute numbers aren't as realistic. G3TXQ's data 
> also shows loss he measured during moderate rainfall, but the increase is 
> from about 0.2 dB to 0.35 dB per 100 feet at 10 MHz. This is inconsequential 
> at the other end of the QSO, and is still far better than the best coax you 
> can buy.
> 
> I guess one question is, as window line ages and gets attacked by smog, 
> becomes dirtier and more sun-baked, will it in fact support a continuous film 
> of water in a rainstorm like soapy water does? Perhaps, in the Arizona desert 
> or in hot and smoggy Los Angeles? And possibly not in another place that gets 
> many times more rain? Do hams have to start waxing their transmission lines?! 
> I forgot to ask Bob the age of his line, but if it's relatively new, maybe 
> it's still able to shed water effectively? Maybe Bob lives in an area where 
> stuff left outside stays relatively clean? Maybe all window line isn't 
> equal... maybe some PE is better than others?? I don't know the answers to 
> any of these questions.
> 
> We may prefer open-wire line (or coax) to window line for good reasons, but I 
> believe it's rash to dismiss window line on the basis of "its loss goes way 
> up when wet". Up, yes. Way up? Probably not. High enough to make a big 
> difference? I doubt it. In planning a new antenna installation, hams should 
> choose the most convenient transmission line for their needs, and should not 
> feel guilty nor apprehensive for choosing window line if they see fit to do 
> so.
> 
> 
> Al? W6LX/4
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:26:13 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Loss in window line [OPINION] [LONG]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> I concur with the conclusion that water has little effect on window line. I 
> base this on my own experience using window line for years. I always feed it 
> into a tuner and, if water has any effect on the line, I have to adjust the 
> settings of the tuner. It is only necessary to adjust the tuner under very 
> heavy rain. Anything resembling a normal amount of water on the line has 
> essentially no effect, even after years of dirt buildup. 
> 
> Years ago, when I had a swimming pool, I spanned the pool with a length of 
> underwater ladder line and made some simple measurements that indicated only 
> a nominal change. And pool water is purposely chlorinated, which increases 
> the conductivity, although I don't know by how much. 
> 
> 73 de dave 
> ab9ca 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jan 14, 2022, at 11:00, Al Lorona <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Whenever somebody mentions "window line" here, one of the first objections 
>> raised is that "when it gets wet, it has very high loss". 
>> 
>> The landmark paper cited is by Wes Stewart, N7WS, which can be found here: 
>> https://www.sadxa.org/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf .
>> 
>> I'm not trying to discredit that paper in any way, but I'd like to point out 
>> two things to keep in mind the next time you hear someone completely and 
>> summarily dismiss window line on the grounds that it has "high loss when 
>> wet", and citing that paper:
>> 
>> 1. You should note that Wes took measurements at 50 MHz. Window line is 
>> rarely used at that frequency, and anyway the loss has to be extrapolated 
>> back down to the HF region. For instance, if wet window line has a loss of 
>> 5.2 dB at 50 MHz, the loss at 10 MHz is only 2.3 dB and at 3.5 MHz is 1.4 
>> dB. (See the paper for the equation to extrapolate to another frequency.) 
>> 1.4 dB sounds a heck of a lot better than 5.2, and is on par with 100 feet 
>> of the best coax you can buy. (We are talking only about matched line loss 
>> here, and ignoring additional loss due to SWR.) So that's the first thing.
>> 
>> 2. Wes's method involved the now legendary use of a "wetting agent" (I 
>> assume soap of some kind) added to the water he sprayed onto his 12-foot 
>> sample of transmission line to simulate rainy conditions on weathered line. 
>> To be fair, Wes himself cautioned that this probably created a worst-case 
>> scenario but judging from other references on the web this wetting agent has 
>> been blamed for excessively inflating the loss to the point of questioning 
>> the relevance of the experiment. DJ0IP and G3TXQ have both claimed that (see 
>> http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/wet_ll/ ).  In G3TXQ's case, he was able to 
>> replicate Wes's results by using "a few drops of washing-up liquid" but he 
>> states, "It is not clear whether the high losses associated with using the 
>> wetting agent were due to the more complete wetting of the line or to some 
>> electrical properties of the agent. Nor is it clear how well this test 
>> represents conditions that will be experienced in the 'real world'."
>> 
>> What's happening to the line when it gets wet, and why should it's 
>> characteristics change at all? To answer this, understand that in balanced 
>> line, the energy is carried in the field between the conductors. Window line 
>> has mostly polyethylene (PE) between the wires which has a dielectric 
>> constant of 2.3, as opposed to air's which is 1.0. Spraying water-- which 
>> has a dielectric constant of 80-- onto PE insulation changes the material 
>> properties between the conductors and, thus, the capacitance. As capacitance 
>> changes, so does  everything else: velocity factor, impedance, and loss. One 
>> thing saving us from a catastrophic change in properties is that water tends 
>> to bead up and remain as droplets, and droplets don't like to stay connected 
>> with other droplets. So if you looked at a path perpendicularly across the 
>> surface of the line, you'd see individual, sparse drops rather than a 
>> continuous film of water.
>> 
>> I couldn't find the dielectric constant of soapy water anywhere on the web 
>> -- but let's assume that the number is close to that of pure water: 80. If 
>> you could somehow give the field a *continuous* path of water from one side 
>> to the other on the window line, you'd have significantly altered the 
>> dielectric constant of the PE; you'd essentially have added a new "path" in 
>> "parallel" with the PE with a dielectric constant some 35 times higher. 
>> Although it would be a very thin layer, it nonetheless could have a 
>> significant effect, as N7WS and G3TXQ have shown.
>> 
>> We also have an important data point from Bob, K4TAX, showing that the loss 
>> of Bob's window line is pretty much unaffected by rain, although the 
>> electrical length does change. I'll address why this might be later on, but 
>> the point is that this is credible, measured data. Why are these data so 
>> different?
>> 
>> I did discover that soapy water's pH is above 10 -- possibly as high as 12-- 
>> indicating that there are abundant salts present, probably sodium and/or 
>> potassium. These dissolved salts strongly ionize the water, greatly 
>> increasing its conductivity (and perhaps changing its other electromagnetic 
>> characteristics). On the other hand, rain water is essentially pure, much 
>> closer to distilled water, with relatively few contaminants capable of being 
>> ionized. (See 
>> https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/cwt/guidance/3130en.pdf).
>>  
>> 
>> Having said all of this, when you study the G3TXQ paper I mentioned earlier, 
>> there's a glaring data point: Steve measured nearly constant, high loss, 
>> using soapy water, *from 7 through 30 MHz*. This confirms that an effect of 
>> the soap is swamping out everything else. In other words, there's something 
>> *in the soap itself* that is skewing the measurements beyond its intended 
>> purpose. He just wanted the soap to make the water cling better, but it 
>> ended up perturbing the very thing he was trying to measure (loss) way too 
>> much. It's a little bit like taking a lot of vitamin D for health, which 
>> causes you to become constipated!
>> 
>> My conclusion is that using soap to make the water cling to the window line 
>> was a brilliant idea but may have introduced much more error into the 
>> measurement. I believe the trend is correct -- that clinging water will 
>> increase loss-- but the absolute numbers aren't as realistic. G3TXQ's data 
>> also shows loss he measured during moderate rainfall, but the increase is 
>> from about 0.2 dB to 0.35 dB per 100 feet at 10 MHz. This is inconsequential 
>> at the other end of the QSO, and is still far better than the best coax you 
>> can buy.
>> 
>> I guess one question is, as window line ages and gets attacked by smog, 
>> becomes dirtier and more sun-baked, will it in fact support a continuous 
>> film of water in a rainstorm like soapy water does? Perhaps, in the Arizona 
>> desert or in hot and smoggy Los Angeles? And possibly not in another place 
>> that gets many times more rain? Do hams have to start waxing their 
>> transmission lines?! I forgot to ask Bob the age of his line, but if it's 
>> relatively new, maybe it's still able to shed water effectively? Maybe Bob 
>> lives in an area where stuff left outside stays relatively clean? Maybe all 
>> window line isn't equal... maybe some PE is better than others?  I don't 
>> know the answers to any of these questions.
>> 
>> We may prefer open-wire line (or coax) to window line for good reasons, but 
>> I believe it's rash to dismiss window line on the basis of "its loss goes 
>> way up when wet". Up, yes. Way up? Probably not. High enough to make a big 
>> difference? I doubt it. In planning a new antenna installation, hams should 
>> choose the most convenient transmission line for their needs, and should not 
>> feel guilty nor apprehensive for choosing window line if they see fit to do 
>> so.
>> 
>> 
>> Al  W6LX/4
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> You must be a subscriber to post.
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> 
> End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 213, Issue 6
> ****************************************

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to