Hi Wayne,
I appreciate that update. The latest I heard is maybe 18 months old or
so, so already this is significant update for me.
Updates will be appreciated as they come. Just seeing progress on the
items needed to be complete is encouragement and progress, even if it
does not give a date for beta-testing beyond what I can do with guestimate.
I see great potential with that ethernet connection in the back, and
being a network guy doing audio and video streaming over packets (and
others) for a living, I just look forward for it to move take the step.
Also, it's an awesome radio with so many things in it from start, I just
love to have the remote handling fully in the box. That and the HD
option is for sure what I look forward to.
It was also with that background I made the comments I did.
Then, down the line after releasing remote handling, IPv6 support
eventually needs to happen, as we soon enter into where that starts to
dominate.
Let the team know that we look forward to test their work, be the test
dummies and provide feedback from the field. Keep up the good work!
73 de SA0MAD Magnus
On 8/17/22 01:34, Wayne Burdick wrote:
Hi Magnus,
I can't put a date on full remote control yet, but I can tell you that the
entire team is working on it.
We recently completed two important pieces of the implementation -- streaming
panadapter data protocol, and internal audio streaming paths. (The latter was
needed both for remote and for the DVR (RX and TX. DVR for TX came out some
time ago, but we're now almost finished with DVR for RX.)
What's left is audio streaming support and radio-to-radio meta level control
protocol. We'll post periodic progress reports.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Aug 16, 2022, at 5:01 AM, Magnus Danielson via Elecraft
<elecraft@mailman.qth.net> wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering about the K4 remote software progress. I just do not seem to
find anything.
At the same time I want to make sure there is good and robust methods doing it.
There is both the HTTP/3 and RIST methods, both public standards and already
tested and available in open source. They also carry with them suitable secure
methods to be used. I used to sit on the RIST committee and my company even
payed for the RIST implementation within FFMPEG.
The two methods have different benefits. We've already made a test
implementation for remote operation over existing HTTP/3 just within a browser
Window.
Anyway, already a Linux remote would work well. As alrways preferably packaged
as Debian packages.
Cheers,
Magnus
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
