Guys your leaving in the speaker which makes some radios sound terrible. Do this: Get your best earphones and plug them in and listen to quality. My AT Sprint 3 which has good audio sounds clean and clear on good signals like WWV when they are not modulated.

I had a Drake 2B and it was the very first good receiver I ever owned. Right now I will put my Yaesu FT-857D receiver up against any comers. But with earphones not the crummy 2" speaker...hi

73 Karl




Darrell Bellerive wrote:
I find the same thing with my K2. I originally thought that something may be wrong, but listening to the same CW signals on a Heathkit SW-7800 are even worse.

I suspect that what we are hearing is simply the solid state audio section. I could be wrong but I don't think that audiophiles are falling over themselves trying to buy audio amps with LM380 and LM386 integrated circuits.

The fact that the odd CW signal sounds perfect is confusing. I am experiencing the same thing.

Be interesting to pipe the audio from the detector into a HiFi tube amp.

Darrell  VA7TO  K2#5093

On August 20, 2006 01:48 pm, Mike Harris wrote:
<quote>
Bad:  The tone of the 2B is noticeably smoother and purer than the K2.
The K2, while it has a good S/N ratio, has a bit of a hollow tone and a
bit of a raspy or bearly edgey CW tone.  The 2B is very pure sine wave.
Very mellow, very nice to listen to.
<unquote>

This has troubled me for quite a while.  Sometimes all CW sigs seem to
have a harsh tone and then you tune into another station that is a pure
note, very odd.  Also the chirpy signals seem to be a nice note, albeit
varying.  I'm beginning to wonder if there is a harsh note built into some
of the modern synth rigs.  SSB sounds OK.



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to