This might have been said already:
I have it in mind that the introduction of the Morse Code as a requirement
for an amateur licence was to enable (in the UK at any rate) a coast station
operator to instruct amateurs to clear the frequency in time of war. Quite
what the form would be or how it would be believed and followed I don't
know.
David
G3UNA
----- Original Message -----
From: "VR2BrettGraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Morse test elimination
N8OHU added:
I'd rather say it's the "fault" of the ITU, if you want the truth. They
were
the ones to let the code go back in 2003.
Not quite - the ITU does what its members decide.
And the end of Morse as licensing requirement
probably started with the JA no-code license -
the first ITU member that "found" a way to get
around the requirement.
The amateur population in JA is now contracting,
but the effect of their no-code license was quite
positive on amateur radio in Japan when it was
introduced.
The effect that had on equipment suppliers is
still obvious today. I wonder what things would
be like now if there was no Incentive Licensing, or
if international opinion would have allowed dropping
the Morse requirement around that time? ;^)
73, VR2BrettGraham
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
