Ron AC7AC wrote:
I believe that's why the K2 uses a fixed-gain wide-dynamic range I.F.
preamplifier (Q22) ahead of the I.F. filter, and puts the variable gain
MC1350 (U12) after the filter where it's reasonably well protected from
off-frequency signals.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A post mixer amp such as Q22 is in some cases required to reduce the IF
system noise figure, and to protect the mixer from the large variations in
input impedance vs frequency exhibited by many narrow bandwidth filters, in
and close to the passband. Several types of mixer including diode rings
generate additional intermodulation products when their load is allowed to
vary, and the same is true of amplifiers unless the amplifier design
addresses the problem.
While the filter can offer protection to later stages, the $64 question is
what happens all along the receiver chain to the audio output when one or
more big signals *do* get through the filter with little attenuation,
alongside that weak signal which you are trying to copy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It helps, too, that the K2 is a straightforward single-conversion design.
More complex multiple-conversion receivers need more protection to do as
well because of all the extra mixers and amplifiers they have. Of course,
that complexity allows for some nice gadgets like front-panel "passband
tuning" but it puts a huge load on the design to stay competitive with a
more simple, straightforward single-conversion superhet like the K2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I won't be drawn into this discussion <g>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of my homebrew designs from the 70's, which also used the MC1350 (that
chip has been around a l-o-n-g time!), used pin diodes to control a
variable
attenuator at the antenna input to the receiver in addition to varying the
gain of the MC1350. After fiddling with it for a long time, I reverted to a
simple step attenuator at the antenna input much like the K2 has.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Understood. Sometimes variable attenuators using transformers wound on
ferrite toroidal cores with a third 'DC' winding used to vary the core's
permeability are useful, but draw too much current for use in a portable
rig.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
That choice speaks to a basic question in the design of anything: which is
the
more eloquent and desirable, extreme complexity that does anything and
everything as well enough and fully automatically, or a simple design that
does specific things very well but which may require a more knowledgeable
operator and greater operator intervention?
I don't think there's any one answer to that question. If there were we'd
not have both automatic and manual transmissions in cars.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is some middle ground between the extremes which you mention!
73,
Geoff
GM4ESD
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
