Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote:
If you mean that it's easier to tune an AFSK signal that has some
residual carrier, that's a poor signal.
It isn't necessary to have any carrier leakage. With the modern
software demodulators using a waterfall display one can fine-tune the
received signal by clicking on the waterfall display.
The point that I'm (still) missing is how is a good AFSK signal is
supposed to be different from a 'true FSK' signal as G4ILO suggested.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
