I don't agree with your implication that people using CW decoders are lazy. Some people's brains just aren't good at certain tasks. There is just no way I can read (or send) code the speed most people do during contests, for example. It is like trying to decode machine gun fire.
Computer decoding has enabled me to make contacts with many places I might not otherwise have done, giving out points during contests. I just hope my K3 is here in time for the CQ WW CW contest. -- Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ??? G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com On 9/18/07, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The best CW DSP decoder I've ever used was the one between my > >ears...sloppy code and all. > > Well said, Lee. So many people these days seem obsessed on trying to > decode CW with electronics rather that taking the bother of training > their brain. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
