Clark wrote:

> ... when changing between the three filters the width of the plot
> varied very little.  I would have expected to see a vastly different
> shape between the 800 Hz filter and the 250 Hz filter.  
>   
> So, do I need to take the "screws" out anyway? 

I'm sorry, OM, but this is the K3 list!  :-)

Seriously, though, I don't know what you could adjust.  The bandwidth is 
controlled by altering the bias voltage on the variactor diodes associated with 
the four-pole IF crystal filter network, which is done by the front panel MPU 
in response to operator input. 

Do you experience a noticable bandwidth reduction as you select the narrower 
filter settings in normal operation?  That effect is very obvious on my K1, as 
determined by the elimination of nearby signals as I choose the narrower 
settings.  The narrow settings are very effective!

I've never used Spectrogram...it seems like overkill for the K1, and it is not 
called for in the "official" alignment instructions.  In fact, it has 
occasionally caused problems for people who used it to align precisely the 
receiver, and then made the (wrong) assumption that they shouldn't have to 
readjust the alignment of the same caps/coils for the transmitter.  But 
alignment of the filter board for transmit is far more critical than the 
alignment for receive.  But none of this has anything to do with what you are 
talking about.

73,
Mike / KK5F
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to