On Nov 29, 2007 7:36 AM, Ian White GM3SEK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm aware of that option, but would only regard it as a temporary > workaround. Connecting a computer and reconfiguring the whole rig is not > the right way to handle a routine change of operators.
I imagine most people have a computer in their shack anyway, and the K3 is probably already connected to it for firmware updates, if not for logging, so where's the difficulty? The real problem with the proposal as suggested is that it would require a whole duplicate area of memory to store just one saved firmware configuration, whereas a computer could store an unlimited number with no overhead. People keep adding ideas to the K3 wish list and Elecraft keep adding them to the list, but I guess that the point has to be reached some time when the K3 MCU runs out of memory to add new features, just as the original one in the K2 did. This doesn't seem to me like a good use of a presumably limited resource. -- Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ??? G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
