I have to second this. The K3 DSP is what DSP should be; the filters are very sharp, yet even at the lower bandwidths (down to 50 Hz) they don't ring excessively. It really shines with the noise reduction function (NR). Firstly, the NR level is adjustable so you can tune it for the minimum necessary for the situation, but even at its most aggressive the ONLY artifact I have noticed is a slightly hollow "bottom of the well" sound with NO degradation of the "information" be it ssb or cw.
Lyle has out-done himself on this! Doug W6JD -------------- Original message -------------- From: Brendan Minish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 11:19 -0500, George wrote: > > Anyone made a DSP comparison of the K3 and Pro III and would like to > > comment? > > I'm not very happy with the Pro III's DSP operation. (Too much coloration > > of > the audio.) > > I spend the CQWW CW contest A/Bing my K3 with my Icom IC-7800. Now the > Icom is for sale. The K3 is miles ahead where it matters > > the K3 sounds very 'transparent' Like a really good analog radio > > 73 > Brendan EI6IZ > > -- > Donât complain. Nobody will understand. Or care. And certainly donât try > to fix the situation yourself. Itâs dangerous. Leave it to a highly > untrained, unqualified, expendable professional. > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [email protected] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
