Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
<snip>

With an increasing number of DSP based receivers, we need a test (rating) system that attempt to measure the "total (peak) receive signal" necessary to generate a IMD products which exceed the receiver noise floor. This is different than either two tone IMD3 measurements at 2/5/10/20/100 KHz or a blocking measurement and is the only way to absolutely compare receivers with different design philosophies and different IMD "windows." 73, ... Joe, W4TV

Perhaps a variant of the old analog microwave measurement protocol could be made to work -- feed a broadband noise signal into the receiver's front end. The noise is notched, so that a specific frequency it is reduced many dB. Then tune the receiver to the notched frequency and observe the signal level. Since the IMD in this case is the product of broadband noise, the IMD will have noise characteristics. Measure the noise level in the notch and it tells you a great deal about the performance of the system in the real world.

Analog microwave systems had hundreds or even thousands of SSB signals, spaced 4 KHz so linearity and low IMD performance was important. However, the signals were more or less of the same peak amplitude, so you did not have the case of several S9+60 dB signals and a few very weak signals. Still, the concept could have some merit in the receiver context. Lots of details to work out, of course.

Jack K8ZOA
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to