Hi, Interesting this.
I struggled for ages with trying to use mHAM CW Keyer (iambic B) until I dropped the paddle setpoint setting to 35. After that it is almost the same as the K2 keyer. Now when using the PC for contest logging I can drop to the paddles without making a total hash of what I'm trying to send. I only use the mHAM a couple of times a year. It will be interesting to see how the K2 and K3 internal keyers compare. The two CW instrument ports on the K3 could be the solution. Regards, Mike VP8NO ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:27 PM Subject: [Elecraft] Winkeyer -> K2 ... weighting equality | The internal keyer in my K2 seems to have a different 'weighting' (or something) compared to my new K1EL Winkeyer. | | I have been playing with the settings on the latter to try and make these two devices 'sound' the same. | | Frankly, after 8+ years, I've grown to like the K2's rhythm in this sense, but don't really care much for the UI of the built-in keyer when operating 'fixed.' And, I needed PC control from several applications, anyway. So I'm converting to the external gizmo. | | So far, the subtleties of the set-up have eluded me. Anyone else do this yet, successfully? Or am I just being very, um, picky? _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
