Understand. I did pick up the DL1, and check the readings. They were along the lines of what I experienced with the MFJ. But I could not read it at a higher power, as it is only a 20w dummy load. But it jibed with what I was seeing. I will get further readings with it and a voltmeter.

Dave Wilburn
K4DGW
K2/100 - S/N 5982


Don Wilhelm wrote:
Dave,

I cannot really give you a quick positive answer - the real answer is "it all depends". To give a positive answer would require that you operate into a dummy load which is 50 ohms non-reactive at all frequencies in question. One can measure the dummy load with an antenna analyzer - expect to see 50 + j0 at all frequencies of interest for reliable and repeatable results.

I do not generally trust any wattmeter (including an uncalibrated Bird) to provide any greater than 20% of full scale accuracy. If the full scale reading is 100 watts, then the error can be as great as 20 watts at any point on its scale. A properly calibrated KPA100 wattmeter can do better than that.

I find that with a good 50 ohm dummy load and an 100 MHz oscilloscope with a 10X probe (probe rated for 100 MHz), I can calibrate the KPA100 wattmeter to less than 5% accuracy on bands below 20 meters - at higher frequencies, the 'scope and probe rolloff will indicate lower than expected results. But I can state that once calibrated, the KPA100 power calibration can be trusted to greater accuracy than the run-of-the-mill wattmeters.

Using a good 50 ohm non-reactive dummy load and measuring the RF voltage across it:
At 4 watts, the Peak to Peak RF voltage will be 40 volts.
At 10 watts the p-p RF voltage will be 63.25 volts
At 40 watts, the p-p RF voltage will be 126.5 volts
At 100 watts, the p-p RF voltage will be 200 volts.

My dummy load is a heat-sinked Caddock MP9100-50.0-1% resistor rated at 100 watts with zero length leads that has been measured flat at 50 ohms up to 60 MHz.

Up to the frequency limits of my oscilloscope, I trust my dummy load and the peak to peak voltage measurement to provide more accurate power measurement than any wattmeter available. I find that, after calibrating with these tools, the typical KPA100 power indications are within 5% of the actual power output.

I can also say that the TelePost LP-200 (and I assume the LP100) will also produce power readings which are within 5% of the actual power after proper calibration. I cannot make such statements about the accuracy of the more common wattmeters which spec their accuracy as a percentage of the full scale reading. A Bird with a 100 watt slug that has been recently calibrated will have an accuracy of 5% of full scale, which is a 5 watt error anywhere on the scale - so a recently calibrated Bird with a 100 watt slug will indicate anywhere between 5 watts and 15 watts for an actual power of 10 watts. One can do better with a precision 50 ohm load and a 100 MHz oscilloscope.

OK, that is my wattmeter rant for this month!!!

73,
Don W3FPR

David Wilburn wrote:
After trying unsuccessfully to get email to take data in tabs, I ended up just putting the information on my website. Sorry for the trouble.

I was playing with an assortment of power meters, and noticed my K2 was reading lower than I expected. The closes things I had to a gauge, was an IC-703+ that had just been to the shop, and repaired, thus I felt it was likely to be putting out 10w.

When I compared a Bird 43 with an element I picked up on line, and one that came with it, it read a bit low. But when I used an MFJ949e, it was right on. Gotta run with what I have.

So I checked out the K2/100 at what it said was 10w/53w/111w (Full Power). And I got the results, that are displayed here;

http://www.k4dgw.com/k2.html

The 10w settings seem a little bit more dispersed than I would have thought. The 10m, 12m & 20m 53w settings seem a bit low. Then at what the rig says is 111w/Full Power, the rig seems even lower.

Do I need to go back through and run the power calibration, or should I start troubleshooting?

I have a KAT100, that was powered down, and the power was taken out of the back of the K2/100.

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to