Barry N1EU wrote:
>
> Bill, I think the 2.9Khz bandwidth measurements for that filter were taken
> at r.f. - for whatever reason, that bandwidth is not translating into a.f.
> - I've seen a.f. measurements done on about 5 samples of the 2.7Khz filter
> and they all run several hundred hertz narrower than the 2.9Khz figure.
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
>
>
Hmmm...I'll have to check mine again. I set DSP to max Width (to take the
DSP filter out of the picture), and used the internal K3 meter (AFV/dBV/AGC
Off) to measure the -6 dB points from an XG1 source. I believe the internal
meter does read AF doesn't it? Maybe I'm getting an average reading
including noise from the wide DSP bandwidth and should be using a narrow DSP
filter after disabling all filters but the 2.7k. With the XG1 at 50 uV I
wouldn't expect noise to be distorting the measurement.
73, Bill
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/K3-SSB----Is-the-5-pole-filter-good-enough-tp15664900p15670496.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
