I expect any such comparison to be premature. The main limitation on "fuller" audio is not being able to vary the transmit passband and I believe that feature will be added in a future firmware enhancement.
The main advantage of the 2.8 filter is probably better immunity to interference by very strong signals that are just outside of the passband due to its steeper slopes than the 2.7Khz filter. 73, Barry N1EU Windy Dankoff KM5Q wrote: > > Has anyone made a direct comparison to determine if a 2.8 filter produces > noticeably better transmit audio? (like fuller, more natural sound). > > Windy KM5Q > K3 ? due late March > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Filter-choice-2.7-or-2.8-kHz---effect-on-transmit-audio-tp15809155p15810429.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
