> Unfortunately, my K3 NR and NB are poor second performers compared to one
> standard, the SGC ADSP2. I've made my concerns to Lyle and Wayne and hope
> improvement will be placed high on the to-do list using the ADSP2 as a
> standard.

I think the difference in performance may be due to the use of quite different 
noise reduction algorithms.

SGC are using what they call Spectral Noise Subtraction (SNS™). I haven't found 
any more info on that, but it may be a variant of the method published by 
Berouti, Schwartz, Makhoul,  “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic 
noise”.  Proc. IEEE In. Conf. on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1979.

The K2 and K3 use a variant of an adaptive filter, I think it is a Normalized 
Least Mean Square (nLMS) filter with a leakage coefficient.

The spectral subtraction method often requires more computer power than 
LMS-methods. For more details, I am sure Lyle KK7P can elaborate.


73

Sverre
LA3ZA

Unofficial Guide to K2 Modifications 
http://www.qslnet.de/member/la3za/K2/mod.html

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to