Jerry Flanders wrote on Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:34 AM

I also have one of Jack Smith's Z-10000U buffer amplifiers (Clifton Laboratories) running between the K3's KXV3 output and the SR40 for isolation. (I didn't test to see if the isolation is really needed - maybe not, since the LO is offset 24 KHz.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Jerry, in my opinion it is always wise to use a buffer amplifier which exhibits a high degree of reverse isolation, such as Jack's Z-10000, when picking off a sample of signals from a receiver's signal path. As I am not too familiar with the K3 I could be wrong but I believe that the point at which you are taking a sample for the SR40 is somewhere between the first mixer and the input of the 8.215 MHz IF filter. If that is the case and you did *not* use a suitable buffer amp, the SR40's LO 'leaked' signal would most likely appear at the input of the filter even though its offset is 24 kHz. This means that the filter has to deal with more unwanted signal power than just the 'routine' stuff coming from the mixer. Even worse is the possibilty that the SR40's LO 'leaked' signal might back up into the mixer, mix with the LO or its harmonics and/ or other signals in the mixer, and produce its own family of spurious products which would cause additional problems for the filter. Some of these products might even lie within the filter's passband and be heard, but I have not done the maths to find out if that is the case.

As an aside, a crystal filter can itself generate significant IMD products if overdriven, which is why it it is essential to measure the IIP3 of a crystal filter at various input levels and spacings when designing a receiver.

73,
Geoff
GM4ESD
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to