Vic,
The K3 uses only a single wire to connect to the SO-239 jacks. The
return path is through the chassis metal. If one adds a direct return
path from the SO-239, that eliminates the potential for a haphazard path
for the return current. While a chassis return may be good enough in
one situation, let's suppose that the builder did not tighten the SO-239
mounting screws adequately, or the mounting hardware has begun to
oxidize, then the return path becomes more 'iffy'. Attaching a return
wire from a lug on the SO-239 to the board ground provides a fixed
return path that is not dependent on the chassis. Note that the return
currents for the two antenna connections can possibly interfere with
each other if there is any small voltage differential on the chassis
(there always is a differential, the question is just how small a
differential is tolerable).
73,
Don W3FPR
Vic K2VCO wrote:
I was told by Elecraft that one of the reasons for the poor isolation
between the antenna ports is this: if you don't have the subreceiver
installed, then the KAT3 subreceiver port is unterminated. So either
install the KRX3 :-) or plug a 50-ohm resistor into the port -- it's
on the top rear corner of the KAT3.
I haven't tried this (I have a KRX3).
I will add that I am not terribly happy with the isolation between the
ports even with the subreceiver installed.
Don Wilhelm wrote:
As an alternative to coax, try using twisted pair - pull a couple
pairs out of a short length of CAT-5 cable. One of the pair would be
grounded at each end (will require adding a solder lug at the SO-239
jack).
73,
Don W3FPR
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
