wayne burdick wrote: > Doug, > > There was plenty of logic behind it, but in hindsight it might not sense > for all users. (It did meet with the approval of our 20 field testers.) > > The change was motivated by the sub receiver. Here's one example: > > Suppose you're using SPLIT, listening to a weak DX station on the main > RX (in a very narrow bandwidth with preamp on), while tuning for a clear > spot with the sub RX (using a wider bandwidth and preamp off). With one > tap of A>B you can move VFO B back to the starting point and work your > way up again. If this also copied VFO A's filter and preamp settings > (etc.) to VFO B, you'd have to set them up all over again. > > But I'll be happy to sit back and listen to arguments pro and con. If it > looks like a lot of operators would prefer to copy everything with one > tap, I could add a menu entry. If no one argues in favor of two-tap > (including the field testers), I could change it outright. I'm easy :) > > Thanks for your input. > > Wayne > N6KR > > --- > > http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > My vote is for the noise gate first ;-) TNX and VY 73, Lance
-- Lance Collister, W7GJ (ex: WN3GPL, WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8) P.O. Box 73 Frenchtown, MT 59834 USA QTH: DN27UB TEL: (406) 626-5728 URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj 2m DXCC #11, 6m DXCC #815 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
