wayne burdick wrote:
>
> Doug,
>
> There was plenty of logic behind it, but in hindsight it might not
> sense for all users. (It did meet with the approval of our 20 field
> testers.)
>
>
I think it is fine - I expect the reason most people thought it odd is
because most of us didn't realise that was how it worked. I would not change
it, I would make it an option -"Double Tap Extensions ON/OFF". Then we could
have double taps for other things as and when the need arises.
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/K3%3A-A%3EB-two-step-%28was-%22illogical-coding%22%29-tp1086165p1087087.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
