I like this ducking idea and would very likely use it. It's sort of a 'soft' QSK.
I certainly understand the benefits of full QSK operation, but it's something that I simply cannot get my brain to cooperate with. To me, operating full QSK with other signals present is like trying to count ball bearings with two or three other people shouting random numbers at me. Even without other signals, the rhythmic pulsing of the band noise messes me up. I usually use semi QSK with a 1/2 second or so delay, but perhaps with an option for something between dead silence and operating volume level, I could train my brain to work full QSK. 73 -- Joe KB8AP On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, wayne burdick wrote: > Keith, > > This is an interesting idea, and I've added it to the firmware > wish-list. Thanks. In the interim you might try a non-zero value of CW > semi-QSK delay, assuming you don't need full break-in. > > Wayne > N6KR > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Darwin, Keith wrote: > >> No, the manual way to achieve this effect is to turn down the AF gain >> while you're transmitting. Sidetone is still there nice & loud but >> the >> RX audio that you hear between elements is reduced. When you're done >> sending, you reach for the AF gain and turn it back up to the normal >> listening level. >> >> Now, imagine it was automatic. As soon as you send, the K3 turns AF >> gain down and leaves it down until a second or so after you finish >> sending, then it turns it back up to where it was. This way, while >> you're sending, the AF signal that you hear between dots & dashes is >> quieter than when you're just listening. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
