Julian, G4ILO wrote:
>
> I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
> doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club,
> and cause nods of agreement from many others.
>
> http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673
>
Just another appliance operator addicted to Icom/Yaesu Kool-Aid. I loved
this comment:
"THE ONLY ATTRIBUTE THAT YOU CAN COMMEND THE K3 ON IS ITS EXCELLENT RECEIVER
SPECIFICATIONS."
Is there much else that really matters? All the big knobs, flashy displays
and boat anchor rigs would have been sucking big time in the CQ 160 CW
Contest this weekend. Just another example that it takes absolutely no
intelligence to make a public fool of yourself on eHam (which is probably
why he did so anonymously).
When the CQ 160 CW soapbox comments are available, I'll post a link with
comments on the K3 by serious operators...not the appliance variety.
73, Bill W4ZV
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/New-Eham.net-K3-review-by-QRPNEW-tp2218086p2218330.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
