> Once you fellows start using split, you won't see a need for this > addition. > > In the old days before XCVRS one would call CQ on the desired > frequency and tune the RX to the answering station. Other than > placing your TX frequency where a DX station is listening, using split > to avoid the situation you describe is the common method. > > The reason for RIT and split in the beginning was to help eliminate > the cost of, and desk top space taken by the RX. > > Tom, N5GE
I often use the split mode on my K3, but also the RIT. In terms of sheer convenience, for casual CW contacts I prefer to use the RIT. Often my subreceiver is on another part of the band, often in a different mode, and I'd rather not change it. The proposed autospot feature does not add any operating complexity to the K3 and entails nothing extra to remember or learn. With this proposed feature, when autospot it enabled, AND the RIT is on, it would merely tweak the receiver frequency but leave the transmit frequency unchanged. I think it would be very handy. The benefit of the autospot feature is that it enables one to dial in the bandwidth without having the desired signal drop off the filter edge. To me, that is a very valuable feature. 73, Jim W8ZR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
