ni0c wrote:
>
>
> I then used the Elecraft K3 Utility to experiment with
> various offset numbers for the 8-pole filter. It only took
> a handful of trials before I came up with a setting of
> -0.09 that resulted in CWT being centered on noise
> and a satisfactory transition with the 5-pole filter.
>
-0.09 equals 90 Hz offset...very consistent with the ~80 Hz others have
measured in 8-pole filters. This is no big deal for wider 8-poles but would
be a noticeable offset for the 400 and 250.
73, Bill
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Using-CWT-to-determine-8-pole-CW-filter-offsets-%28was%3A-Shift-pitch%29-tp2289330p2289434.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
