Darwin, Keith wrote: > Yes, but this isn't about the best performing rig. The KWM-2 certainly > had limits and deficiencies (cost being one of them), yet it left a mark > on ham radio that continues to this day. > This might be true if you think "the world" is "the USA". Speaking for the rest of the world I would say the KWM-2 left no mark at all, it was far too expensive and be course of that not very common.
/ Jim SM2EKM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
