>We all have a wide view of the hobby and I for one respect that,
 >however I believe that NO mod is required and if done by FW then
 >some very intense testing will need to be done as we have seen
 >with the latest FW Beta releases the testing period was rushed and 
several changes had to be done.

I appreciate your views, and certainly your situation is different from 
others, both those who want their radios to handle strong signals well, 
and  those who don't care. 

However, again, I feel compelled to point out that your belief that "NO 
mod is required" is inconsistent with the "wide view of the hobby."
I personally have no need for ESSB, but I appreciate the fact that 
Elecraft has spent time on it to satisfy the needs of others who do, 
thus broadening their customer base.  And I fully expect that Elecraft 
will be able to pull off this, and other future changes, without adverse 
affect on other uses of their equipment.  

In summary, I don't believe that Elecraft needs a series of messages 
from hams saying not to implement optional features in the fear that it 
might break something.

Leigh/WA5ZNU
> Quote
>
> Sentiments like the one below make me think that quite a few people have 
> not yet encountered HFpack, one of the largest ham radio interest groups.
>
> To the contrary.
>
> We have studied widely on portable operations. As we live in a remote area of 
> Australia HF comms is not a novelty, it is absolutely vital to assist S and R 
> people to find you when something happens. It is not a game. We (Australia) 
> gave the world (the UN also) the Codan and Barrett radios and antennas. 
> Australia gave the US military some sophisticated communications technology 
> and the testing of this type of equipment is done in Outback Australia, not a 
> convenient few hundred square miles of *desert* and because we live in an 
> area such as this we do practice all types of HF mobile and portable comms.
>
> Backpacking around these parts can be quite difficult and dangerous, we have 
> had many deaths over the years because communications were either inadequate 
> or a lack of proper planning was not done correctly or worse, not done at all.
>
> I repeat, I do not expect anyone I know would be so foolish as to enter my 
> property talking on ssb @ 100W if they bothered to look up the tower and saw 
> the HF Quad (5 bands) and had any anticipation of a warm greeting at the door.
>
> The next multi-op operation by way of *remote* will be at Conjuboy Station 
> (Con_jew_boy) (Ranch) which is large enough that it is marked on the road 
> maps of Queensland.
>
> We will be running:
>
> K3 and FT-897D
> 10/15/20m 4 element triband yagi
> 80M full wave loop
> 40m full wave loop
> 30m full wave loop
>
> FT-847
>
> 6m 5 element wide spaced yagi
> 2m 9 element yagi
> 70cm 13 element yagi
>
> All within a small clearing beside a creek fed by a natural spring.
>
> I do not think we will have any issues this time either, again due to 
> planning the operation.
>
> We all have a wide view of the hobby and I for one respect that, however I 
> believe that NO mod is required and if done by FW then some very intense 
> testing will need to be done as we have seen with the latest FW Beta releases 
> the testing period was rushed and several changes had to be done. 
>
> A single FW change can be fine for the intended change but can lead to 
> problems for many owners who had no need for the change to be done.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>   

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to