For one thing, if you're jumping back and forth between CW and SSB it's nice to have the computer log the mode appropriately ... it's pretty easy for any operator to forget to change the mode manually each and every time. Rig control does it for you. And with regard that, the N3FJP software doesn't properly pick up digital modes anyway ... if you switch the rig to RTTY or PSK you have to manually type in the new mode when you make the change. It isn't even available as a drop-down selection.
Also, the original requester wanted to key the K3 from the N3FJP FD logger using various message macros. That's certainly possible, but if I remember correctly (I could be wrong) there is no full-time display to show which function keys hold which messages. You'd need a paper crib sheet to educate each new operator. With N1MM, the macros can be sent from the function keys, but they are also accessible as on-screen mouse buttons that display text to help you remember which one to click on. One of the coolest benefits of rig control with a competent program like N1MM, however, is the band map capability. Even without packet feeds, the bandmap can show you stations displayed by frequency ... the ones you've already worked are shown in gray text and the ones you had previously flagged to try later show up in color. Clicking on a callsign automatically resets the rig to that frequency. That's a neat feature for the average Field Day operator that is don't mostly search-and-pounce. Besides, the various operators don't need to know how to set up N1MM. Once it is installed, and without the bells and whistles turned on, in my opinion it is as simple to use as N3FJP with less chance for human error. Dave AB7E R. Kevin Stover wrote: > Writelog and N1MM are both more powerful software packages but how much > power do you need for field day? We're not talking about dedicated CQ WW > teams who get together and practice using software for three months > prior. For the most part FJP's FD logger gets used by folks on field day > who "contest" once per year. They have neither the time nor inclination > to learn something like N1MM. > > I'm wondering why anybody would "need" rig control during field day. > > > Jim Brown wrote: > > >> Writelog and N1MM are much more powerful contest loggers, have >> lots of slick features, and take a bit longer to learn. But they >> are WELL worth the effort. N1MM is FREE. Writelog is not. I >> started with Writelog, used it for 2-3 years, switched to N1MM a >> few years ago and like it better. >> >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
