At 09:26 27/05/2009 -0700, wayne burdick wrote:
>The K144XV increasing K3 band coverage to 160-2 m, which will be 
>great for those with limited space or the need for 2 m for 
>portable/mobile/marine operation. But it isn't for everyone, of 
>course. Some 2-m ops will prefer the slightly better NF and higher 
>power output of an external transverter.

I'd like to know a little more about the K144XV receive 
performance.  The Noise Figure is given as "<2 dB", while the 
external XV144 has a NF "typically 0.8 dB".  This seems like a 
significant difference.  The XV144 also has a high dynamic range 
front end - how does the K144XV compare?

Neill
F5VLD / G4HLX

K2/100 #2425
K3/100 #289

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to