Joe Planisky wrote: >> Some times you can't satisfy all the people all the time with one >> road. > > Truer words were never spoken! > > I'm a full time CW operator (well, 99.9% CW, 0.1% digital modes.) I > played with the pre-3.25 NR quite a bit and I was never able to find a > setting that made a CW signal easier to copy, so I never actually used > it in a QSO. Post-3.25, I find I'm now using it more often than not. > My preference would be for progress to continue in the 3.25/3.27 > direction. Of course, ideally they'll come up with a way to let each > operator use what works best for them. > > 73 > -- > Joe KB8AP
I also operate mostly CW .... 3.27 isn't bad, but over the year or so I think the best DSP firmware was DSP 1.81 It was one of the better balances of audio level for NR on/off. And the CW signals came up out of the noise - or the noise went down. But ..... it doesn't work right anymore with the newer MCU & FPF levels. That DSP is part of k3fw2r10.zip which I have labeled "FD 08" in the folder with all the old firmware sets. 73 Hank K8DD ____________________________________________________________ FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
