Hello Tim,

QRP did work sometimes with this magic band.  In the past cycle, I used 5 watts 
and made contact between Oman and Hong Kong.  Also 10 watts between Brazil and 
Hong Kong.  Of course, QRP will need more patience and skill.

I never tried K2+ XV50 on field days because it is too convenience to be 
carried.  On the other hand, I used K2 only for HF during field day.

cheers,

Johnny VR2XMC




________________________________
寄件人﹕ Tim O'Rourke <[email protected]>
收件人 [email protected]
傳送日期﹕ 2009 年 9月 11 日 星期五 上午 12:16:37
主題: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] XV50 vs FT817?

I would strongly disagree on several points!
I have run 6 meter QRP for years and they do not call it the magic band for 
nothing.
I have 50+ countries on 6 meter QRP at last count.
I run QRP from QTH as well as mountain tops and when conditions are right you 
do not need more than a few watts for SSB or CW and yes most VHF contest have 
CW activity although not as much as I would like.
As for the virtues of KXV verses the 817 I use both but the 817 is my mtn top 
rig even with the higher current drain I like one rig for all bands, I use a 
220 5 watt xverter fron a QST article with the 817 also. The KXV's are more 
sensitive and have a little more output and I use them at QTH. I like the ease 
of switching bands and the offsets for keeping frequency easy to see.
Personaly I just do not like taking my K2 and transverters mountain topping. 
Tim W4YN


Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] XV50 vs FT817?
To: "Peter Wollan" <[email protected]>,
    <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <bd1e3cea7d744b80afc4ccf708440...@billslaptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
    reply-type=original

Peter,

There are no VHF CW contests, per se. There is usually some 50 MHz CW activity 
in the June ARRL VHF QSO party and the July CQ WW VHF contest, but this is 
probably about 10% or less of the activity level on SSB. DX chasing, on the 
other hand, is typically more fruitful on CW. But chasing 6 meter DX with QRP 
is 
an exercise in frustration. DX signal levels are simply too weak for QRP.

For 6m SSB, you will want at least 100W output into a decent directional 
antenna 
to be competitive in the Low Power category of ARRL VHF (up to 200W). There are 
no power categories in the CQ WW, so you're competing directly against the KWs 
in this one.

Bottom line -- Outside of extremely strong 50 MHz sporadic-E openings, "VHF" 
and 
"QRP" don't really go together that well, though some guys do seem to enjoy the 
challenge. For me, life is too short for 6m QRP. :-)  I enjoy making QSOs too 
much, I guess.

Good luck,
Bill W5WVO


Peter Wollan wrote:
> An XV50 + KIO2, adding on to a QRP K2, is getting within shouting
> distance of the cost of an FT817.  Could someone comment on the
> relative merits, for use as a first multimode VHF rig?  My guess is
> that the XV50 is better, but does less.  In addition to just exploring
> on CW and SSB, I'd want to participate in some VHF CW contests.
>
>    Peter N8MHD

Tim O'Rourke 
[email protected]
Low Power Amateur Radio Rocks 
Member of Flying Pigs,ARCI,GQRP,RSGB,ARRL Life Member
NHRA Life Member
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl..net/donate.html



      Yahoo!香港提供網上安全攻略,教你如何防範黑客! 請前往 http://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/ 了解更多!
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to