Hi Tony, You'll get somewhat better isolation using the BNC jack for the sub receiver's aux antenna, rather than the non-transmit KAT3 antenna. Either way, the trip point of the KRX3's carrier-operated relay is typically 1 to 2 watts. To play it safe let's say you want to keep it down to 0.5 W. That's 30 dB down from 500 W.
One of our staff engineers, Bob Friess (N6CM) did the math: If the antenna were a point source, in free space, and 100% efficient, a separation of about 80 meters would be required. In the real world you'd probably need less than this. If 80 meters of separation isn't possible, you could use a PIN diode attenuator controlled by the KEY OUT line to remove RF from the sub's aux antenna input during TX. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Tony Fegan VE3QF wrote: > An antenna system for 160M with separate 2M diameter shielded > receiving > loop is to be set up at a temporary location. The transmitter will run > 500W. There will not be much time for experimenting so I would like to > know what problems we may encounter. > How much isolation (distance) is required between the main > transmitting > antenna and the receiving loop? Is there any isolation difference > between wiring the sub receiver for BNC or via the KAT3? I am wired > for > BNC at the moment but that can be changed. > > 73 > Tony Fegan VE3QF > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
