If I want to use it as both QRP and QRO, then it seems like 2.6kHz is the way to go. I have the 100w amp and tuner and plan on using them at home. Probably will be operating QRP most of the time, but I want to put out the "best sounding signal" possible, too.
What is the difference in "power" between the 2.4 and 2.6 kHz bandwidths? -john W4PAH Don Wilhelm wrote: > John, > > The 2.6 kHz bandwidth does indeed sound better, but if you are going to > keep that K2 as a QRP rig, then I suggest the 2.4 kHz width because > there will be more power in the passband. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > John Shadle wrote: >> Hi all, >> I'm trying to get my K2 finished soon and am hoping to work on the >> KSB2 module this weekend and early next week before some work/leisure >> travel to California. One mod I'm planning on incorporating in the >> KSB2 module is the SSBCAPKT, which allows for either 2.4 or 2.6 kHz >> SSB signals. >> >> I've checked my BFO and I can do either mod, so that is not an issue. >> I'm wondering what I will be gaining/losing in either case. If I can >> do 2.6, should I do it? >> >> Any experience/assistance is appreciated. >> >> 73 >> -john W4PAH >> > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
