I suppose it might be feasible to define pairs of "on" and "off"
macros and combine them into "toggleable" (?) switches (to save
buttons). I'm not sure how the current status could be represented on
the display, though.
I think that a complete macro "undo" is probably not feasible - there
are just too many variables.
~Iain / N6ML
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Ed Muns <[email protected]> wrote:
> Many people also have the SUB on while SPLIT, so would be a second button
> tap if they want to turn the SUB off as well. Others turn off RIT during
> SPLIT and would want that enabled again. So, there is reason to "undo" or
> "reverse" some macros. Having a toggle function saves a Programmable
> Function button.
>
> That said, as you point out, not every command is a simple two-state
> function and thus the toggle action may be ambiguous. However, for macros
> that contain only toggle commands, then a Programmable Function button can
> be a single button toggle for that macro. For example, this macro toggles
> SPLIT/SUB/RIT on and off:
>
> SWT13;SWT13;SWH13;SWT48;SWT45;RC
>
> Of course, for those who want to move VFO-B to an offset frequency or
> explicitly turn RIT/XIT on or off (rather than toggling it), a macro
> "toggle" feature is needed.
>
> Ed - W0YK
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Ed Muns
> Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com
> FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard
>
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
