RE: Audio Peak Filter requests A number of folks have asked for this, including some who have not commented here. Many of these guys obviously used a "audio peak filter" before, found it useful, and now miss it.
As before, I have no issues with any requests, as long as they are user-selectable as OPTIONS and not mandatory. But I have to ask why for this one. It has been my experience that one uses an audio peak filter when the IF filtering is inadequate...it is "another layer" of support (rejecting "unwanted" signals). But hey guys...the stock K3 goes down to a 50hz bandwidth...at IF and AF (if I understand the DSP correctly). Fifty HERTZ! I think that is a just as narrow (if not much narrower) and with as steep skirts (if not steeper) than you will ever find on the Audio Peak Filtering on any past or current radio. Not only can you narrow down the DSPs to 50hz, but you can also set the "pitch" to whatever you like. Doesn't that do the same thing (only better)? QUESTIONS: Are you sure that you actually need this? Have you tried the method cited above? Why/how would an audio peak filter be "better" or a further enhancement? Thanks and Happy New Year! de Doug KR2Q PS...recently I posed another such comment on a different topic and I got some very good answers which taught me at least one new trick...so this is definitely not a sarcastic question. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
