M, Because they have answered it already, and Eric answered just the day before all this started. You can check the archives if you want. I was just re-stating what Wayne, Lyle and Eric had already stated.
73, Don W3FPR The Smiths wrote: > Why is Don, or any other person other than Eric or Wayne answering this > simple question? Both can make ONE simple statement that tells the enquiring > people everything they need to know. I'm tired of all this conjecture, when > the answer should simply be told by the very company that knows what's going > on. No offence Don... > > Thank you for your intended help, but certainly I think that the people > asking the questions, knowing full well both Eric and Wayne monitor this > board, can clear this up themselves. Then I can get back to reading my daily > email without the 400 e-mails about the same question over and over again. > Thank you. > > And now, if you will, Wayne.... > > M > > >> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 07:51:06 -0500 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> CC: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] DIY DSP Rev D >> >> David, >> >> Yes, Wayne, Lyle and Eric have stated that the results were quite >> similar to the W9AC mods, but were done in a different manner (I presume >> it was easier to accomplish resistor changes in board manufacturing). >> There may have been some other insignificant 'tweaks' to the hardware >> done at the same time (just because it was convenient). But there are >> no functional or performance enhancements associated with those changes. >> I would think if Elecraft had made improvements, they want to advertise >> that fact, a better K3 should sell better. >> >> Some of these questions are beginning to sound as though there is some >> "conspiracy" going on. The fact that a board level B can be upgraded to >> assembly level D (with the component changes and the LPF) says that the >> board printed traces has not changed. Note that the board level relates >> only to the printed traces, solder pads, etc. The assembly level can be >> quite different. >> From the information that we have, the original board was assembly B >> (same as the board level), then the low frequency response was extended >> resulting in level C - finally, Eric decided to add the LPF since it was >> available, resulting in assembly level D. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >> David Cutter wrote: >> >>> Dave >>> >>> I would gladly fit this daughter board and perhaps do the LF enhancement, >>> but several on this list seem to be saying that the exchange DSP board does >>> something more than these mods provide. >>> >>> Can anyone clarify? >>> >>> David >>> G3UNA >>> >>> >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.124/2597 - Release Date: 01/02/10 > 03:22:00 > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
