> Likely? I don't know.
Likely is a better choice since raising the AGC threshold seems to be the primary goal of much of the "PRE/ATT/RF Gain dance" we've seen recently. The hardware AGC (HAGC) would seem to provide an ultimate limit on level to the ADC - unless the ADC can't handle the transient peaks - so a higher threshold for the DSP derived AGC would be helpful in many ways. 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lyle Johnson > Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 11:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP AGC Question > > > Hello Joe! > > Assuming that the threshold values have not changed in a major > > way since Jack's measurements, would it be possible to extend > > the range of threshold values - say to AGC THR=016 at about > > -80dBm (assuming 2 dB per step)? > > > > Possible? Yes. > > Likely? I don't know. There are a lot of side effects that > happen when the threshold is raised... > > 73, > > Lyle KK7P > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
