Guys, Let's end all Skimmer pro-con arguments -now- before this gets out of hand.
Any discussion of CW Skimmer's applicability for contesting is OT for this list. Best to discuss on the contesting forums or by direct email. Eric WA6HHQ List Moderator _..._ [email protected] wrote: > > >> Since Skimmer is nothing more than a more accurate and visual >> form of Telnet or Packet cluster those using it should submit logs in >> the assisted category just like those who use the DX clusters now >> are required to do. >> -- >> R. Kevin Stover >> ACØH >> > >The assisted categories were created to capture the ASSISTANCE by SOMEONE >else, another operator via other means, packet, telephone, internet. > >Skimmer is another GADGET in operator's shack, using his equipment, antennas >etc. just like any other gadget in the shack. We are technical sport using >technology gadgets and operator skills. Classifying gadget, skimmer as (human) >assistant is the example of twisted logic. >Besides, skimmers would eleviate problem of packet pileups (which sucks) as >individual skimmers, using individual antennas and setups would come across >the "juicy" ones and flag them to operator, spreading the pileups. >Mybe we should go back and classify everything besides spark gap and hand key >as "assistants"?? > >73 Yuri, K3BU.us >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[email protected] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
