Not meaning to pour gas on this, but... Is it just me that doesn't understand the idea of hi-fi in amateur radio, for HF anyway? I always thought the goal for voice modes was a good "communications" response, an intentional "low-fi". i.e. good response in the frequency range of the human voice (something like 300 to 1 or 2 khz), but with peaks and dips, as well as rolloffs on the ends as needed to increase intelligibility without unnecessarily increasing bandwidth.
This is a trend I've only picked up on recently and I'm a bit mystified by it. I don't use voice modes which might be why I don't understand, but help an aging brass pounder (and soon-to-be-PSK nut) out on this, hi hi... 73, LS W5QD -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Ten-Tec-never-sounded-so-good-tp4903799p4904804.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
