Just out of curiosity, why would one need full QSK at those speeds? By then the characters are so fast that, seems to me, you could use a short enough delay to keep from T/R switching between individual dits and dahs but still have QSK for all practical purposes between letters?
I'm like Cookie in that my sending is still poor enough that this won't be an issue for a long long time. Tho ironically I'm now better with my vibroplex bug than with my bencher. And actually having to decide which one I'd rather put the lions share of practice into at this point, hihi. But that's a seperate story. My copy speed is still only between 25 and 30 wpm, tho I can handle contest style exchanges and very plain/basic language at around 35. So I'm well well away from this with QRQ QSK ever becoming an issue for me, but am still wondering? 73, LS W5QD -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/How-is-K3-QRQ-QSK-performance-50-100-WPM-tp5048269p5051096.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
