Ah, okay Mike, I missed that this was already "universally rejected" by everybody...
I assumed TenTec and Yeasu tried to implement this for a good reason, but weren't succesfull, and I had the illusion Elecraft could be the first to come up with a good solution. But ofcourse I won't stand up to a universally rejected idea. 73' Paul PD0PSB >Paul, >The QWERTY arrangement of keys on a keyboard was implemented in early >typewriter days to slow typists down, so they wouldn't jam the type bars >together. There have been schemes proposed since those days to >re-arrange the keys for greater efficiency/speed, and those proposals >have met with universal rejection. >The point is, that no matter what the advantage, you're just not going >to change some things. >73, Mike NF4L -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-feature-request-query-tp5186033p5190142.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
