Andrew, The XG2 is controlled for its output *level*, but the frequency is dependent on the specific crystal. Much better to use WWV as the reference for calibration than the XG2 (unless you have previously measured the XG2 frequency with a precise instrument).
73, Don W3FPR Andrew Moore wrote: > I ended up using WWV at 20.0 MHz. > > Works great. > > Problem was that the freq must really be known -- i.e. the XG2 won't cut it, > unless I know its exact frequency... > > Thanks all > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
