While I do love me some Elecraft, what I find most amazing, and motivating, about the WRTC scores are the antennas and power levels they used:
http://www.wrtc2010.ru/?id=23 * 20/15/10 m tri-bander with one feed line and PL-259 male connector on 12m tower with antenna rotator and control unit * 40 m Inverted V dipole with feed line and PL-259 male connector * 80 m Inverted V dipole with feed line and PL-259 male connector * 2 x 100 watts peak power monitors with the 80v at about 11m and the 40 at 10m, I assume attached to the same tower. Three to 4 thousand QSO's and 3 to 4 megapoints with 100 watts, one transmitter at a time on a too-low tower? Incredible, motivating, and a bit depressing as it puts paid to a cherished complaint: it's my antennas fault! Byron KI6NUL K1 #2799 wayne burdick wrote: > > Elecraft didn't influence anyone's WRTC rig choice. It's possible some > of our customers did. If so, thanks :) > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-WRTC-Customs-Pro-Forma-listings-tp5295782p5298036.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
