Regarding:
Jeff wrote ...
> [ Note: Voters will
execute almost the same ballot regardless of what
> ranked voting method we choose. -- JRF ]
> ranked voting method we choose. -- JRF ]
I feel this is undoubtedly true. I think it is very important to keep the
idea of ranked ballots on the table, because us voters intuitively are good at
ranking things. Give me a ranked ballot and I can fill out, and allow me to help
figure out how to count ranked ballots as a SEPARATE issue. Just give me ranked
ballots and I can live through using a "wrong" method to count 'em for a few
election cycles.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simmons, Forest
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EM] FW: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better ProposalSomehow this message didn't pass muster for the Condorcet list.
From: Simmons, Forest
Sent: Wed 9/28/2005 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better ProposalJeff wrote ...> [ Note: Voters will execute almost the same ballot regardless of what
> ranked voting method we choose. -- JRF ]
Forest replies:If voters are going to rank the candidates without regard for the method, then there is no gratuitous approval problem in the implicit approval version of DMC.
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
